Which version of Zeppelin are you running?
There was a bug, where killing Zeppelin wouldn't actually kill the
interpreters, because the kill signal wasn't passed through, but that was
fixed in 0.7.1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2258
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Ruslan Dautkhanov <dautkha...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> We have each user running their own Zeppelin instances,
> so everyone has Spark interpreter group defined as
>
> "option": {
> ..
> "perNote": "shared",
> "perUser": "shared",
> ..
> }
>
> which translates to "interpreter will be instantiated
> Globally in shared
> process."
>
>
>
> --
> Ruslan Dautkhanov
>
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> What mode do you use ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Ruslan Dautkhanov <dautkha...@gmail.com>于2017年4月7日周五 上午12:49写道：
>>
>>> A user managed somehow to launch multiple instances of spark interpreter
>>> under the same Zeppelin server.
>>>
>>> See a snippet of `pstree` output:
>>>
>>> |-java,6360,wabramov -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms1024m -Xmx2048m
>>> -XX:MaxPermSize=512m-Dlog4j.configuration=file:///home/wabramov/
>>> | |-interpreter.sh,4510 /opt/zeppelin/zeppelin-active/bin/interpreter.sh
>>> -d /opt/zeppelin/zeppelin-active/interpreter/spark -p 45986 -l/opt/zeppe
>>> | | `-interpreter.sh,4523
>>> /opt/zeppelin/zeppelin-active/bin/interpreter.sh
>>> -d /opt/zeppelin/zeppelin-active/interpreter/spark -p 45986 -l/opt/zeppe
>>> | | `-java,4524 -cp/etc/hive/conf/:/opt/zeppel
>>> in/zeppelin-active/interpreter/spark/*:/opt/zeppelin/
>>> zeppelin-active/zeppeli
>>> | |-interpreter.sh,5097 /opt/zeppelin/zeppelin-active/bin/interpreter.sh
>>> -d /opt/zeppelin/zeppelin-active/interpreter/spark -p 39752 -l/opt/zeppe
>>> | | `-interpreter.sh,5110
>>> /opt/zeppelin/zeppelin-active/bin/interpreter.sh
>>> -d /opt/zeppelin/zeppelin-active/interpreter/spark -p 39752 -l/opt/zeppe
>>> | | `-java,5111 -cp/etc/hive/conf/:/opt/zeppel
>>> in/zeppelin-active/interpreter/spark/*:/opt/zeppelin/
>>> zeppelin-active/zeppeli
>>>
>>>
>>> I see another user has three (3) instances running of %sh interpreter.
>>>
>>> Is this a known issue?
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ruslan Dautkhanov
>>>
>>
>
