Felix,
Yes, I said a bit confused. I want to release Zeppelin with some - not-all
- interpreters, but deploy all interpreters into maven to install them if
users want to use them.

Moon,
I think it's the best to fit the list as same as homepage by default as it
makes users confused less. But if we want to add more interpreters, I think
mailing questions and related issues are one of the proper criteria.

Jeff,
Agreed. We already had a menu but it just shows how to use
install-interpreter.sh.

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> If possible, we need to integrate the install script in zeppelin UI. As I
> would expect many users would ask why some interpreter is missing and how
> to install them.
>
>
>
> moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org>于2017年6月5日周一 上午2:06写道:
>
>> Following is last discussion related to release package size.
>>
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/69f606409790d7ba11422e8c6df941
>> a75c5dfae0aca63eccf2f840bf@%3Cusers.zeppelin.apache.org%3E
>>
>> at this time, we have discussed about having bin-all (every
>> interpreters), bin-min (selected interpreters), bin-netinst (no
>> interpreters) package but didn't conclude the criteria and how we make a
>> decision.
>>
>> Jongyoul, do you have any idea about criteria?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> moon
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 10:47 AM Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Sure - I think it will be important to discuss what criteria to use to
>>> decide what is included vs what will be released separately.
>>>
>>> _____________________________
>>> From: Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com>
>>>
>> Sent: Sunday, June 4, 2017 9:47 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Reducing default interpreters while building and
>>> releasing Zeppelin
>>> To: dev <d...@zeppelin.apache.org>
>>>
>> Cc: <users@zeppelin.apache.org>
>>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It means we release with some interpreters and deploy all interpreters
>>> into
>>> maven separately. We already had a install-interpreter script inside it.
>>> If
>>> someone wants to install specific interpreter not included in default
>>> release package, they can use that script to install specific one.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Are we proposing some interpreters to be built and released separately?
>>> >
>>> > Is this going to be separate packaging? Or separate release pipeline?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _____________________________
>>> > From: Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com<mailto:jongy...@gmail.com
>>> <jongy...@gmail.com>>>
>>> > Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 11:04 PM
>>> > Subject: [DISCUSS] Reducing default interpreters while building and
>>> > releasing Zeppelin
>>>
>> > To: dev <d...@zeppelin.apache.org<mailto:d...@zeppelin.apache.org
>>> <d...@zeppelin.apache.org>>>, <
>>>
>>
>>> > users@zeppelin.apache.org<mailto:users@zeppelin.apache.org
>>> <users@zeppelin.apache.org>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Hi dev and users,
>>> >
>>>
>> > Recently, zeppelin.apache.org<http://zeppelin.apache.org> is being
>>>
>>
>>> > changed for increasing user experiences and convenience. I like this
>>> kind
>>> > of changes. I, however, saw some arguments that which interpreters we
>>> will
>>> > locate in the first page. I'd like to expand its argument to the
>>> package we
>>> > release.
>>> >
>>> > Current zeppelin packages exceed 700MB with default option because
>>> > Zeppelin tried to include all interpreters by default. It was good at
>>> the
>>> > early age but, nowadays, Zeppelin community suffer from the size
>>> because
>>> > ASF infra allows the package size under 500MB. So I'd like to reduce
>>> the
>>> > package size by reducing default packages.
>>> >
>>> > In case of rebuilding homepage, community proposed some criteria
>>> including
>>> > mailing list and # of question in stackoverflow. I think we can adapt
>>> same
>>> > criteria into release version of Zeppelin.
>>> >
>>> > To handle this kind of issue, I think consensus of community is the
>>> most
>>> > important factor. If someone wants to have an idea to deal with it,
>>> please
>>> > feel free to talk about it.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Jongyoul Lee
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
>>> > http://madeng.net
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
>>> http://madeng.net
>>>
>>>
>>>


-- 
이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
http://madeng.net

Reply via email to