Felix, Yes, I said a bit confused. I want to release Zeppelin with some - not-all - interpreters, but deploy all interpreters into maven to install them if users want to use them.
Moon, I think it's the best to fit the list as same as homepage by default as it makes users confused less. But if we want to add more interpreters, I think mailing questions and related issues are one of the proper criteria. Jeff, Agreed. We already had a menu but it just shows how to use install-interpreter.sh. On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If possible, we need to integrate the install script in zeppelin UI. As I > would expect many users would ask why some interpreter is missing and how > to install them. > > > > moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org>于2017年6月5日周一 上午2:06写道： > >> Following is last discussion related to release package size. >> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/69f606409790d7ba11422e8c6df941 >> a75c5dfae0aca63eccf2f840bf@%3Cusers.zeppelin.apache.org%3E >> >> at this time, we have discussed about having bin-all (every >> interpreters), bin-min (selected interpreters), bin-netinst (no >> interpreters) package but didn't conclude the criteria and how we make a >> decision. >> >> Jongyoul, do you have any idea about criteria? >> >> Thanks, >> moon >> >> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 10:47 AM Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Sure - I think it will be important to discuss what criteria to use to >>> decide what is included vs what will be released separately. >>> >>> _____________________________ >>> From: Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com> >>> >> Sent: Sunday, June 4, 2017 9:47 AM >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Reducing default interpreters while building and >>> releasing Zeppelin >>> To: dev <d...@zeppelin.apache.org> >>> >> Cc: <users@zeppelin.apache.org> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> It means we release with some interpreters and deploy all interpreters >>> into >>> maven separately. We already had a install-interpreter script inside it. >>> If >>> someone wants to install specific interpreter not included in default >>> release package, they can use that script to install specific one. >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Are we proposing some interpreters to be built and released separately? >>> > >>> > Is this going to be separate packaging? Or separate release pipeline? >>> > >>> > >>> > _____________________________ >>> > From: Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com<mailto:jongy...@gmail.com >>> <jongy...@gmail.com>>> >>> > Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 11:04 PM >>> > Subject: [DISCUSS] Reducing default interpreters while building and >>> > releasing Zeppelin >>> >> > To: dev <d...@zeppelin.apache.org<mailto:d...@zeppelin.apache.org >>> <d...@zeppelin.apache.org>>>, < >>> >> >>> > users@zeppelin.apache.org<mailto:users@zeppelin.apache.org >>> <users@zeppelin.apache.org>>> >>> > >>> > >>> > Hi dev and users, >>> > >>> >> > Recently, zeppelin.apache.org<http://zeppelin.apache.org> is being >>> >> >>> > changed for increasing user experiences and convenience. I like this >>> kind >>> > of changes. I, however, saw some arguments that which interpreters we >>> will >>> > locate in the first page. I'd like to expand its argument to the >>> package we >>> > release. >>> > >>> > Current zeppelin packages exceed 700MB with default option because >>> > Zeppelin tried to include all interpreters by default. It was good at >>> the >>> > early age but, nowadays, Zeppelin community suffer from the size >>> because >>> > ASF infra allows the package size under 500MB. So I'd like to reduce >>> the >>> > package size by reducing default packages. >>> > >>> > In case of rebuilding homepage, community proposed some criteria >>> including >>> > mailing list and # of question in stackoverflow. I think we can adapt >>> same >>> > criteria into release version of Zeppelin. >>> > >>> > To handle this kind of issue, I think consensus of community is the >>> most >>> > important factor. If someone wants to have an idea to deal with it, >>> please >>> > feel free to talk about it. >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Jongyoul Lee >>> > >>> > -- >>> > 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 >>> > http://madeng.net >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 >>> http://madeng.net >>> >>> >>> -- 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 http://madeng.net
