I went back and rebuilt 0.7.2 and it seems that the issue has gone away. 

Not sure what changed or which setting could have been causing the issue with 
socket connections. 


> On Oct 18, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Michael Segel <msegel_had...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The error:
> ERROR [2017-10-18 00:00:00,003] ({pool-2-thread-20} Job.java[run]:188) - Job 
> failed
> org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.InterpreterException: 
> org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.InterpreterException: 
> org.apache.thrift.transport.TTransportException: java.net.ConnectException: 
> Connection refused (Connection refused)
>        at 
> org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.remote.RemoteInterpreter.interpret(RemoteInterpreter.java:354)
>        at 
> org.apache.zeppelin.interpreter.LazyOpenInterpreter.interpret(LazyOpenInterpreter.java:97)
>        at org.apache.zeppelin.notebook.Paragraph.jobRun(Paragraph.java:406)
>        at org.apache.zeppelin.scheduler.Job.run(Job.java:175)
>        at 
> org.apache.zeppelin.scheduler.RemoteScheduler$JobRunner.run(RemoteScheduler.java:329)
>        at 
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
>        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
>        at 
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
>        at 
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
>        at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
>        at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
>        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> 
> And this in the zeppelin spark interpreter log:
> ERROR [2017-10-18 10:39:29,582] ({BoneCP-pool-watch-thread} 
> PoolWatchThread.java[fillConnections]:118) - Error in trying to obtain a 
> connection. Retrying in 7000ms
> java.sql.SQLException: A read-only user or a user in a read-only database is 
> not permitted to disable read-only mode on a connection.
>        at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.SQLExceptionFactory40.getSQLException(Unknown 
> Source)
>        at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.generateCsSQLException(Unknown 
> Source)
>        at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.TransactionResourceImpl.wrapInSQLException(Unknown 
> Source)
>        at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.TransactionResourceImpl.handleException(Unknown 
> Source)
>        at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.handleException(Unknown 
> Source)
>        at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.setReadOnly(Unknown 
> Source)
>        at 
> com.jolbox.bonecp.ConnectionHandle.setReadOnly(ConnectionHandle.java:1324)
>        at com.jolbox.bonecp.ConnectionHandle.<init>(ConnectionHandle.java:262)
>        at 
> com.jolbox.bonecp.PoolWatchThread.fillConnections(PoolWatchThread.java:115)
>        at com.jolbox.bonecp.PoolWatchThread.run(PoolWatchThread.java:82)
>        at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
>        at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
>        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: A read-only user or a user in a read-only 
> database is not permitted to disable read-only mode on a connection.
>        at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.SQLExceptionFactory.getSQLException(Unknown Source)
> 
> 
>> On Oct 18, 2017, at 10:36 AM, Michael Segel <msegel_had...@hotmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi, 
>> 
>> I’m running 7.2 compiled against MapR 5.2
>> 
>> I have nginx in front of Zeppelin so I run zeppelin on the local host port 
>> and use nginx as a proxy w ssh. 
>> 
>> After running zeppelin for approximately 24 hours, if I login and try to run 
>> a paragraph in any notebook, I get a java error, connection refused. 
>> 
>> Even trying to restart the interpreter (any interpreter results in a 
>> failure.) 
>> 
>> I’m going to assume its human error on setting up the configuration. 
>> 
>> Any suggestions? 
>> 
>> Thx
>> 
>> -Mike
>> 
> 

Reply via email to