If we can support both 2.10 and 2.11 and gracefully dropping 2.10 support for SparkInterpreter, that would be better. And I think it's totally fine only portion of interpreter supports scala 2.11.
Thanks, moon On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:50 AM Eric Charles <e...@apache.org> wrote: > Two facets/questions here: > > 1. Are we willing to support both 2.10 and 2.11, or move to 2.11 > (dropping 2.10 support) ? > > 2. Spark default build is now 2.11, not sure the other interpreters > support 2.11 (last time I looked Flink, it was not supported - didn't > look scaling...). So would we agree to have partial 2.11 support (only a > portion of the interpreters)? > > > On 23/02/16 17:03, moon soo Lee wrote: > > Hi, > > > > There're some related issues and some discussions in it. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-605 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-450 > > > > So far, no patch or pullrequest has been created. It'll be very nice if > > we could have patch for 2.11. > > > > Thanks, > > moon > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:59 AM Jordan G <jor...@ravellaw.com > > <mailto:jor...@ravellaw.com>> wrote: > > > > Is there any work being done, people also interested in > > collaborating on, and/or useful resources for getting Zeppelin to > > work with Scala 2.11? > > >
