On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Jim Elwell wrote:
> Bill Potts writes:
>
> > 2. I wish, in any case, that the CGPM would listen to
> > the recommendations to
> > change k to K, h to H and da to D.
>
>
> I've not heard of this suggestion before, but it sure makes
> sense!
Jim,
The proposal of options for *alternatives* (da or D, h or H, and k or K)
was the topic of many recent postings in this Forum, including e-mail
exchanges with officials in the CCU and at the BIPM.
Perhaps you were unsubscribed during these exchanges or deleted them
without reading?
Gene.
