Wizard of OS wrote: > so you can drop author some lines to clear it! It's not worth the effort. I'm sure others have already pointed out his error.
> I'll keep using quadrat at the end! And, thus, you will continue to be gloriously wrong. > by the way how would you read Nm��in german? > yes it is Newtonmeterquadrat!!! I don't know about Nm�. II would read N/m� as Newton pro Quadratmeter, or preferably as Pa, or Pascal (or, in English, pascal). What property is Nm� supposed to measure? Bill Potts, CMS Roseville, CA http://metric1.org [SI Navigator'
