Well, in that case you were disagreeing with something I didn't say. I said the A series was not SI; I didn't say it was not metric.
And, regarding your last sentence -- that's exactly what I meant! I cannot understand why you would assume otherwise. Bill Potts, CMS Roseville, CA http://metric1.org [SI Navigator] -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Adrian Jadic Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 18:21 To: U.S. Metric Association Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [USMA:17592] "Metric Today" paradox You got me here. My mistake to write such a long message and not revise it properly. What I meant was that I disagree that the A-series are not metric. At least this is what I understood from your original message. If you meant that it is not SI because SI has nothing to do with standards for products and practices then I *totally agree* with you. However, I don't think you meant that. Adrian ========================== Bill Potts wrote: Adrian Jadic wrote: "I totally disagree with your statement that A-series is not SI." Adrian Jadic also wrote, in the next two sentences: "Actually, it cannot be SI since SI deals only with units of measurement and not with standards for industry/consumer products and practices. For that we have ISO." How can you say you disagree with me and then paraphrase what I said? You can't have it both ways. Or did you mean to say "totally agree?" Bill Potts, CMS Roseville, CA http://metric1.org [SI Navigator] -- _______________________________________________ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup 1 cent a minute calls anywhere in the U.S.! http://www.getpennytalk.com/cgi-bin/adforward.cgi?p_key=RG9853KJ&url=http:// www.getpennytalk.com
