On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 14:32:46 Adrian Jadic wrote: >Thanks Marcus. > >Just reading my message again I would like to clarify something. I am not >pro-regulationism. As we have seen in all Socialist countries of the eastern >bloc, taking this option to the extreme is a catastrophe. Even countries >like France experimented with too much regulationism and they regretted. > >Like anything else in life it has to be a balance. It's like walking on a >cliff. If go left you fall on the left side if you go on the right you fall >on the right side. Only few manage to keep their balance. >... >My belief is that W&M is by definition a regulatory matter. And like with >all regulations there is a reverse proportionality between the speed of the >application and the amount of damage. (high speed=low damage) I do believe >however, that there is strong need for explanations and public debates in >which the public has to be explained why they have to go through this. >... Your point about 'extreme... regulationism' is evidently well-taken. And I was not assuming you meant any differently. However, there MUST be some degree of it as you so persuasively put.
Marcus Is your boss reading your email? ....Probably Keep your messages private by using Lycos Mail. Sign up today at http://mail.lycos.com
