Just posted:

The above comments point out the reality that one of the major industrial 
nations on Earth (the U.S.) continues to use non-metric units in matters of 
everyday life and that this creates a burden on many people, inside and 
outside the U.S., to convert back and forth between this hodgepodge of units 
and metric units. 

But those comments neglect to mention that the U.S. is much more metric now 
than it was in the 70s when the government de-funded the metric program. 
Virtually all federal building projects are now metric. Roughly half the 
money spent on highway construction in the U.S. is being spent on projects 
designed and constructed in metric units. The Navy's latest class of 
amphibious assault ships was designed in and is being built entirely in 
metric units. 

Over half of all Americans live in states who now allow metric-only labeling 
on products regulated by the states. Work is in progress to amend the FPLA to 
do the same at the federal level. These steps are partly in response to 
global economic pressures. Japan and the Republic of Korea forbid importing 
any items for sale that contain any non-metric indications; all goods sold 
there must be marked only in metric units. Australia has similar laws. The 
European Union has a directive that goes into effect at the end of 2009 to do 
the same thing; it is on its third and probably last deferment of the 
effective date. 

The reason for this global market move is that the metric system has become 
the international language of measurement, just as English has become the 
international language of business. Non-metric units present an opportunity 
for fraud in countries where they are not recognized and the ban on them is 
spreading. 

Let's face it, Americans, we're outvoted! That's global democracy for you and 
money is the ballot. Our share of global trade has slipped from 15% to 10% in 
the last decade and our American businesses are being forced by existing 
federal law to continue retailing in non-metric units, which is an additional 
cost factor. 

Before you get too wound up trumpeting the virtues of you favorite yard, 
pound, and gallon, you should realize that those have been defined in terms 
of the metric system for about 108 years now. In 1875 we were a charter 
member of the group that started the metric system off as the international 
system of measurement. Shortly after 1805 we did our first coastal survey 
using the original meter standard and coastal surveys have been done using 
that unit, directly or otherwise, ever since then. The metric system is as 
much a part of us, if not more so, than any other collection of units.  If 
you think we stopped metricating in the 70s, you just haven't noticed the 
changes since then. 

For a brief, online history of the metric system, see the work in progress at 
   http://www.cofc.edu/~frysingj/background.htm 
And for more on the continuing move towards metrication in the U.S. see 
   http://www.metricmethods.com/UPLR.html 
and 
   http://www.metricmethods.com/theneed.html 

 J.R. Frysinger, CAMS 
 Dept. of Physics and Astronomy 
 College of Charleston 
 Charleston, SC 29424 
 http://www.cofc.edu/~frysingj

Reply via email to