Bill, FWIW - I think you'll find trying to reconstruct the massive library of phrasing definitions and sender rules in Outlook to be more trouble than it's worth. I too use the Rules Wizard to sort USMA feed and other things, but these only require one simple rule.
Nat PS If you ever want a program to automate Outlook mail exchange from within Spamkiller, let me know. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Bill Potts > Sent: Monday, 2002 April 29 15.44 > To: U.S. Metric Association > Subject: [USMA:19793] RE: Off topic (Spamkiller) > > > I've now downloaded Spamkiller from your site. Once more, thanks. > > However, before I install it, I'm going to look at all the Outlook 2000 > Rules Wizard options I've never bothered with before. > > I already use the Rules Wizard to redirect all kinds of messages > (including > USMA list server messages, CNN Breaking News, Postmaster messages, etc.) > both to specific subfolders within my Inbox folder and to other > folders and > subfolders (including several for email from Microsoft, for example). As > options are available to reject or redirect messages from specific domains > or with specific words in the message body (and on the basis of a host of > other criteria), it's possible that Outlook 2000 can already do everything > Spamkiller can. > > Bill Potts, CMS > Roseville, CA > http://metric1.org [SI Navigator] > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:51 > > To: U.S. Metric Association > > Subject: [USMA:19786] RE: Off topic but about WSJ attitudes > > > > > > On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 12:16:27 -0400, you wrote: > > > > >Bill, John, > > > > > >Last message on this thread.... > > > > > >I don't know what happened to Spamkiller's website, unless the McAfee > > >acquisition is the cause. At any rate, I uploaded the program to some > > >personal webspace at: > > > > > >http://www.win.net/dorsea/spamkiller/ > > > > What looks like a similar product is at http://www.spambar.com > > > > I'm not sure I would want to use these, as they require you to > > identify all the addresses you want to receive mail from; other > > addresses have to confirm they are real. It seems quite clunky. I'd be > > interested to hear from others how effective they are. > > > > Chris > > > > -- > > UK Metric Association: http://www.metric.org.uk/ > > > > >
