Actually I don't mind there Wiz. 1.8 L is a valid size, 2 L may be too big in a lot of cases. The fact that the're now using an odd FFU size* - 60 vs. 64 floz. - shows they're no longer catering to FFU.
Nat I know, all FFU sizes are "odd" > let's rather get rid of 1,8 L switch to 2 L only! > no FFU > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nat Hager III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 8:33 PM > Subject: [USMA:21636] incrementalism > > > > Have to laugh at P&G's incremental approach. 2 years ago I say Downy > fabric > > softener on the shelf labled something like: > > > > 64 fl oz (2 Qt) 1.89L > > > > A year ago it was: > > > > 1.8 L (1.9 Qt) 60 fl oz > > > > Now I notice it as: > > > > 1.8 L (60 fl oz) > > > > Come on, let's get rid of the parenthesis stuff and be done with it! > (Oops - > > but there's unammended FPLA in the way!) > > > > Nat > > > > >
