Just a clarification point, please.
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 13:05:55
CirgreeSys wrote:
>... This system
>discounts all of the problems that have been brought up in the and still no one
>will even offer to take a look at this metric time system for validation or what
>ever.
>
What 'system' are you referring to, please? Ditto for the following sentence below.
>Years have gone into developing this system and it is real and I have made
>about 250 of these clocks and booklets for different people.
>
>Will the habitual word ever wake up?
>...
Finally, what 'clocks' would these be? I'm trying to get swatch folks to produce a "prototype" for my percentime watch, but they haven't answered me yet... :-S
Marcus
Re :
Marcus; I know that these e-mails are based on metric things and not metric time as it has never worked before now.
I do feel for you and you efforts to get the Swatchâ company to build a proto type clock
for you.
I myself was faced with that same problem and came up with a system of metric time that uses standard clock parts that are already being built any way. That is just part of why the Cirgree Sys.â and the metric clocks do work.
This system also has a RCC model (radio controlled clock) that monitors a radio wave sent out by Fort Collins and received by this clock and it is self correcting. To hear this of Fort Collins and this metric clock. For the Shocking part ,,,, Fort Collions sends the
signal as a standard time signal and this metric clock fits even this signal. Metric time is every thing that standard time is and them some more. only it is easier
Any way I have to run and I would like to hear from you and anyone else on this subject even if it is in a more private mail forum.
Tim "Time to advance the mind"
