Dear Han,

In case you need to refer to it, the International Organization for
Standardization document for shoe sizes is  ISO 9407:1991.

Cheers,

Pat Naughtin LCAMS
Geelong, Australia
-- 

on 2004-05-16 04.29, Han Maenen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[USMA:29530] Re: trousers in Holland:

> I put the following message on the Metricsucks board:
> 
> The only trousers bought with sizes in inches in The Netherlands are jeans,
> as the manufactureres of these garments only offer their inch sizing system
> to everybody in the world who buys their products.
> All other trousers are sold in a sizing system using numbers which no-one
> understands.
> However, the EU countries are going to change to a new sizing system for ALL
> clothes, which will include jeans. The system will use a unit of length, no
> meaningless numbers anymore. But, unlike the inch-system used for jeans,
> that system will use centimetres.
> I hope that this opportunity will be used also to change once and for all to
> the British-designed metric MONDOPOINT shoe sizing system that has become an
> ISO standard; ISO will also adopt the metric sizing system as a standard.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Out of interest, how to you buy your trouses
>> in Holland? In inches, as somebody maintains
>> on this board and others, or in cm?
> 
>> As you say, imperialists are great in using
>> daft soft conversions to make metric look
>> silly. They keep on harping that a 1/3m is
>> ridiculess, as if any metric person would
>> ever care about such a useless distance.
> 
> Han
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Mighty Chimp
> To: U.S. Metric Association
> Sent: Thursday, 2004-04-15 1:04
> Subject: [USMA:29525] trousers in Holland
> 
> 
> Han,
> 
> This was posted to metric sucks as a response to your post.  You may want to
> go there and answer hos question.
> 
> Euric
>> I use the metric system every day and I have
>> no use for British and American units at
>> all. The stuff down here is total
>> gobbledygook to me. I assume that the person
>> who wrote this is deliberately spewing
>> disinformation and falsehoods about the
>> metric system.
>> One very common trick of the anti-metric
>> ones is attempting to 'prove' how stupid and
>> complicated the metric system is and
>> invariably they come up with garbage one
>> will in fact never encounter in a metric
>> country (see below).
>> The symbols used are ludicrous, and the
>> conversion from 1/4 mile to metric is
>> ridiculous. Where you say 1/4 mile, we say
>> 400 m (not 400 -/m) and certainly not the
>> ludicrous 402.337 m or the absurd concoction
>> used for that: 4 h/m.......
>> Where you say 3 miles, we say 5 km (not 5
>> k/m).
>> And so on.
>> Han Maenen, The Netherlands
> Out of interest, how to you buy your trouses in Holland? In inches, as
> somebody maintains on this board and others, or in cm?
> As you say, imperialists are great in using daft soft conversions to make
> metric look silly. They keep on harping that a 1/3m is ridiculess, as if any
> metric person would ever care about such a useless distance.
> 

Reply via email to