I tend to agree with Mr. Wade in using the liter over meter-cubed. Although the liter 
is not an official base unit of SI, it is more convenient to use the prefixes in 
regards to unit-conversion than meter-cubed. The liter is also more convenient to 
speak of than meter-cubed.

--
-----Thanks!-----

Cole Kingsbury
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

----------------


> >I don't believe anything I wrote earlier contradicted what you wrote 
> >below. Specifically I do not believe I said that the litre is 
> >deprecated for non-precision use. I said that I understood it to be 
> >advisable not to use the SI prefixes with litre; for example, since 
> >1000 L = 1 m^3, therefore the cubic metre should be used, not the 
> >kilolitre.
> 
> But this would negate one of the main advantages of the liter: the fact that
> it follows the 'normal' linear use of prefixes.  Translating milliliters into
> liters or back is as easy as converting between millimeters and meters.
> 
> Whereas I see the need for converting to cubic meters when coherence is
> required (e.g. calculating densities etc), to suggest that we shouldn't use
> milliliters (almost universally used on soda cans here) or centiliters (widely
> used in the wine industry) would be a huge own goal.  Remember, the aim is
> to encourage the use of the metric system.  Adopting strategies that make
> it more difficult are definitely counterproductive.  Liters are probably
> the metric units that most Americans are familiar with, thanks to Coca Cola.
> Lets be grateful for that.
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tom Wade             | EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> EuroKom              | X400:  g=tom;s=wade;o=eurokom;p=eurokom;
> Unit A2              |        a=eirmail400;c=ie
> Nutgrove Office Park | Tel:   +353 (1) 296-9696
> Rathfarnham          | Fax:   +353 (1) 296-9697                        
> Dublin 14            | Disclaimer:  This is not a disclaimer
> Ireland              | Tip:   "Friends don't let friends do Unix !"
> 

Reply via email to