The idiot doing the posting knows nothing about prefixes.  So if he wants to write 
kilometer he shows it as "k/m".  Millimeter would be "m/m".  Just plain meter has no 
prefix, but this messes up his little system, so he shows it as "-/m" meaning there is 
no prefix.

Carleton


> 
> In my ignorance, can some one tell me what "-/m" means?
> Thanks,
> Marion Moon
> 
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> My posting on http://www.metricsucks.com on the use of the aquare foot and 
> square metre by realtors.
> 
> The claim that the square foot is used by realtors all over the world is
> false. 
> In mainland Europe the square metre and the hectare are used for measuring and
> 
> selling property and the same is valid for all countries that have been using
> 
> the metric system for some generations.
> 
> The square metre is unusable.... what poppycock.
>  
> This gobbledygook is totally beyond me. What does that 1.333... nonsense
> mean?
> 
> > 1.3333333 sq. -/m does not equal 1 -/a 
> > 1.3333333 sq. -/m does not equal 1 da/a 
> > 1.3333333 sq. -/m does not equal 1 h/a 
> > 1.3333333 sq. -/m does not equal 1 k/a 
> etc.
> 
> And why this stupid -/m stuff. THIS IS TOTALLY FALSE. THE SYMBOL FOR METRE IS
> a 
> lower case m without a period.
> 
> BTW: NERE W&M have been dead since 1840. Then the Napoleonic system of weights
> 
> and measures, established in 1812 and using old Paris units and metric 
> standards was replaced by the metric system proper in France.
> NERE W&M are dead, but since 1893 we have NEARE
> Napoleon Emperor's Republic of America Weights and Measures, otherwise called
> 
> United States Customary Units, based on Old-English units and metric
> standards. 
> Yes, Napoleons weights and measures are alive and kicking in the USA!!!!!!
> 
> Han Maenen, from the metric Netherlands
> Up Metric!
> 
> 
> 
> > Tony, 
> 
> > Regarding your bullet-in-board of June 13th 
> > @ 12.46 a.m. quoting the United Kingdom of 
> > Ulster & Grand Breton 'Estates Gazette' 
> > of May 15th. 
> 
> > "In real estate and building rentals at 
> > least, the sq. -/m is going the way of the 
> > stt.po. of 16 1/2' that older readers will 
> > remember from the back of school books. 
> > Folks simply do not talk in square metre'. 
> > They talk in square feet. Realtors do it. 
> > Owners and renters do it. Even qualified 
> > investment managers do so. So let's talk, 
> > and write, in sq.'." 
> 
> > Tony, realtors do not use the sq. -/m in the 
> > U.K. for exactly the same reason that 
> > realtors throughout the world do not use the 
> > sq. -/m. The sq. -/m is unusable. 
> 
> > All realtors, in all countries of the world, 
> > use the square foot, or something based on 
> > the square foot. 
> 
> > Most Napoleon Emperor's Republic of Europe 
> > Weights & Measures are difficult, but 
> > not impossible, to use. But the sq. -/m is 
> > just impossible to use in superficial 
> > measure. 
> 
> * incredible nonsense
> 
> > The nere scheme descended into gobbledygook 
> > when it supposedly created its' NERE 
> > Superficial Measure. If you look at it you 
> > can see that it doesn't measure anything. 
> 
> > 43,560 sq.' = 4840 sq.yd. 
> > 43,560 sq.' = 1210 sq.fth. 
> > 43,560 sq.' = 160 stt.sq.po. 
> > 43,560 sq.' = 16 stt. pennylands 
> > 43,560 sq.' = 10 stt.sq.ch. 
> > 43,560 sq.' = 4 stt. roods 
> > 43,560 sq.' = 1 stt. acre 
> 
> > 348,480 sq.' = 38,720 sq.yd. 
> > 348,480 sq.' = 9680 sq.fth. 
> > 348,480 sq.' = 1280 stt.sq.po. 
> > 348,480 sq.' = 128 stt. pennylands 
> > 348,480 sq.' = 80 stt.sq.ch. 
> > 348,480 sq.' = 32 stt. roods 
> > 348,480 sq.' = 8 stt. acres 
> > 348,480 sq.' = 1 stt.ml. (superficial) 
> 
> 
> > 13.333333 sq. -/m does not equal 1 -/a 
> > 13.333333 sq. -/m does not equal 1 da/a 
> > 13.333333 sq. -/m does not equal 1 h/a 
> > 13.333333 sq. -/m does not equal 1 k/a 
> 
> > 133.33333 sq. -/m does not equal 1 -/a 
> > 133.33333 sq. -/m does not equal 1 da/a 
> > 133.33333 sq. -/m does not equal 1 h/a 
> > 133.33333 sq. -/m does not equal 1 k/a 
> 
> > 1333.3333 sq. -/m does not equal 1 -/a 
> > 1333.3333 sq. -/m does not equal 1 da/a 
> > 1333.3333 sq. -/m does not equal 1 h/a 
> > 1333.3333 sq. -/m does not equal 1 k/a 
> 
> > Info @ 
> 
> > http://www.weights-and-measures.com 
> 
> > And topics: 
> 
> > Common Superficial Measure 
> > Napoleon Emperor's Republic of Europe 
> > Decadent Superficial Measure 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to