Try this:
Go to www.washingtonpost.com
Under "Opinion" (on the left), click on "Discussions"
On the upper right, click on the logo "Viewpoints"
Select "Airbus" from the list (July 20, 2004).
The metric question is about two-thirds of the way down.
Carleton
-------------- Original message --------------
It is not possible to click this link anymore. Does anyone know what was said about metric aviation?
Han
========================================
Message date : 02-08-2004 11:26
From : "MightyChimp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To : "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Copy to :
Subject : [USMA:30603] Re: Metric aviation, from the head of Airbus North America
It is better to use Rich-text or HTML to have links that don't break.
Euric
----- Original Message -----
From: "David King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, 2004-08-01 18:59
Subject: [USMA:30597] Re: Metric aviation, from the head of Airbus North
America
> For long URLs, it is often better to make a short one, using
> http://tinyurl.com and then you something like
> http://tinyurl.com/4xqnr
> which takes you to the site linked to below, but avoids the problem of
> the link being so long it breaks up before the end of the line.
>
> David King
> *!
> *
> Carleton MacDonald wrote:
>
> >This link is from a recent discussion on www.washingtonpost.com -- the
> >metric reference is a little more than halfway down.
> >
> >Carleton
> >
>
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/liveonline/advertisers/viewpoint_airbu
s
> >072004.htm?nav=vpbox
> >
> >
> >
>
>
