They did it because it was economical for them to do so. 
 
The use of metric in these machines is transparent to the majority of the public.  Only enthusiasts and mechanics know that the machines are metric.
 
Here are some reasons that these companies may have gone and others are starting to now;
 
1.) Pressure from mechanics, enthusiasts, suppliers, etc. to reduce inventory of parts.  FFU fasteners present a redundancy that adds cost where it need not be.
 
2.) There may be a safety issue with continued inch use.  It maybe be possible to mix inch and metric fasteners.  A 3/8 bolt will fit into an M10 thread.  Under stress this may fail and cause injury or death.  Also, Machines that you mentioned normally use fasteners of high property class (like 8.8 or greater) and the equivalent in FFU may be increasingly hard to find or becoming more costly.  If the major players are using metric in those classes, then the minor players will have to pay more for the inch versions.
 
3.) International demand.  The Americans may reluctantly accept dual usage including the cost of buying and having a second set of tools, but the world isn't that accepting and will avoid buying products that have a impediment to servicing at a tolerable cost. 
 
4.) International manufacture.  Machines and parts made outside the US are metric.  Can you imagine the cost and confusion if B&S made a metric version of an engine model in China in metric and an inch one in the US? 
 
 
What you see is an example of the voluntary use of metric.  Voluntary only works if everyone agrees to do it.  It also means a long gap between when the first go and the last one follows.  In the meantime everyone suffers. 
 
Euric
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, 2004-08-29 12:34
Subject: [USMA:30927] volunteering to Metric

Hello again.  I would like to comment on what Marcus said about companys not going metric on their own.  Did the government of the US or Canada tell Ford GM and Chrysler to use metric fasteners in their cars? Maybey they did but i don't think the average person in either government in either country cares one way or the other if the car he or she is driving has inch or metric fasteners. The same with the heavy diesel engine industry did the government in either country tell Caterpillar Cummins or Detroit diesel to use metric fasteners on their engines? The new Harley Davidson motor cycle called the V Rod introduced in the summer of 01 is a metric machine from the ground up.  Did the government tell Harley they had to design this machine in metric? On Jul. 1 2003 Briggs and Stratton changed the fasteners on one of their engines from inch to metric, i have talked to people at Briggs and they have plans to convert more of their engines to metric fasteners.  Did the federal government tell Briggs to do this?  Marcus i am not trying to offend you and there is no offence intended. I believe that the companys i mentioned above went to metric fasteners and design of their own free will.  If they didn't want to and the government tried to force them i think they could of all banded together and fought it tooth and nail. Thanks John Mercer.                   

Reply via email to