I had to revise some of the wording which I mistyped earlier.
David King wrote:
I wonder why costs would be an issue? Ireland needed to revamp its speed limits in order to reduce traffic accidents. What price do you put on human life? Ireland took the opportunity to metricate it road speed limit signs at the same time, and bring in new rational and safe metric speed limits, which is something that will help all those concerned. I expect it will make roads safer, and that the costs are fully justified. What would not be justified would be to have two sets of speed limits, one metric and one imperial.It was suggested earlier:
< <<suggests that most people are quite comfortable with metric units. >>
I don't deny that most people would be - my question would be more of whether its worth the costs - considering that at the end of the day its just numbers on a dial being matched with numbers in a big red circle.>
Most of the world now has metric speed limits, even in the USA they have some!! But in the UK it is still illegal for the Dept of Transport to erect any. I realise that a cost is involved in producing new speed limit signs, but if the UK govt took the view of the Irish govt, that speed limits in some areas need revising, then they could combine the 2 and save money and hopefully save lives. In back streets a speed limit of 30 mph (48 km/h) is too fast and should be reduced to 30 km/h.
* Although most drivers do not always observe speed limits, some will, and in general people drive faster than the limit, so if the limit is lower then people will still drive faster than the limit, but not as fast as before (when limits were higher), especially if the police enforce speed limits on the really fast drivers. *
There are many things that now require changes in the rules/laws etc, as the costs to human life are becoming too great. The sooner smoking is banned in enclosed public places and all workplaces (as it was last year in Ireland) the better as it will help save lives. Reducing speed limits on some roads is also needed, and if combined with metrication of speed limits it will also help those people who drive in the UK and in km/h countries to just have to deal with one unit for speed, i.e. km/h. I know that lots of UK drivers do drive in Europe, especially France, so why have 2 different speed limit units, when 1 will do for all countries?
David King