Karl, CC sirs:
What calendar is perfect?
It have tried to argue, and presented my case for astronomers and 'calendar
group' to make improvements - my dedication of some 35-years, as a common
man would feel & want, in short to have NO or minimal changes; AND as the
French Revolutionary people desired: to find an *easiest, suerest &
cheapest* proposal that does NOT hurt Socio-Cultural & Politico-Economic set
up, to meet the over-view of Leauge of Nations and now United Nations. My
calendar approach:
satisfy the impacts feared towards COST that may need be incurred if and
when the change need be brought about:
(a) No change to 7-day Sabbath cycle;
(b) No change to 12/24-hour clock face;
(c) No/or minimal change to Gregorian calendar format;
(d) No major change to mathematical/trigonometric functions; and
(e) to find the most easily adaptable scheme with least possible changes
to get a
surest, easiest and cheapest transitional proposal.
I have recently created a PP presentation (although still improving), since
recently learnt, which is about (1 MB). I can send if Victor and/group like
to share for uploading on Calndr-site.
Todays 'eclipse' was partial in India (between 16:20 (16h34md) PM thro 17:23
(17h39md) PM), India time; and marked special significance. It marked:
(a) end of Pitri-shradhs and the START of NAVRATRAS;
(b) a Soma-vati Amavasya; and
(c) the start of 10-day 'Metric Decaday - October 04 thro October 13),
co-incidentally with the Papal Bull of 1582 AD - when calendars lost
10-days.
Regards,
Brij Bhushan Vij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Kali5106-W25-00)/D-275+1 (Monday)2005 Oct.03H (decimal) IST
Aa Nau Bhadra Kritvo Yantu Vishwatah -Rg Veda
Jan:31; Feb:29; Mar:31; Apr:30; May:31; Jun:30
Jul:30; Aug:31; Sep:30; Oct:31; Nov:30; Dec:30
(365th day of Year is World Day)
******As per Kali V-GRhymeCalendar******
Telephone: +91-11-25590335
From: "Palmen, KEV (Karl)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: East Carolina University Calendar discussion List
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ogam and Yerm Lunar RE: Table-calendars for 6479 years
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 12:41:03 +0100
Dear Charles and Calendar People
-----Original Message-----
From: East Carolina University Calendar discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Charles Moyer
Sent: 01 October 2005 09:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Table-calendars for 6479 years
What calendar is perfect?
KARL SAYS:
My yerm calendar is better (never two days out in UT), but only because it
is a pure lunar calendar.
However, the Ogam wheel can predict today's eclipse:
Given my 40th Birthday Eclipse on 16 February 1999 at gn#15 L12f (not
L12o).
Today (gn#2 G4f) is in the 7th year counting from that date.
Those 7 years have 5 occasions (#15F, #16G, #18H, #19R, #2T) where the new
moon has jumped over a tree-month and 4 occasions (#16L, #17C, #19F, #1G)
that a full moon has jumped over a tree-month. This suggest an eclipse 4 or
5 tree-months before the end of those 7 years (#3L). The resulting
tree-months are (#2M and #2G). So we may have an eclipse today and like my
Birthday eclipse it is Annular.
Karl
07(13(01 - Happy New Moon!
> From: "Palmen, KEV (Karl)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: East Carolina University Calendar discussion List
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:03:19 +0100
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Table-calendars for 6479 years
>
> Dear Charles and Calendar People
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: East Carolina University Calendar discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Charles Moyer
> Sent: 30 September 2005 12:55
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Table-calendars for 6479 years
>
>
>> From: "Palmen, KEV (Karl)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: East Carolina University Calendar discussion List
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:11:45 +0100
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: Table-calendars for 6479 years
>>
>> Dear Charles and Calendar People
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: East Carolina University Calendar discussion List
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Charles Moyer
>> Sent: 29 September 2005 10:46
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: Table-calendars for 6479 years
>>
>>
>> Victor,
>> What OW date that I have given to this list has ever been off by more
>> than one day? Why would I bother to do that?
>>
>> KARL ASKS: Why not?
> Why don't you answer the first question also? But then as in the past
you
> have proved to be very selective in your editing. You do me a great
> disservice, Sir.
>
> KARL SAYS:
> Because it would show that the Ogam wheel is not quite as good as
Charles
> claims it
> is.
> Now Charles can answer why not?
>
> Karl
