One of my other groups got off on a metric tangent.  This is from a poster
who used to live in San Francisco but now lives in Australia.   It seems
like his USA background still affects his opinion.

Carleton 

-------------------------------------------------

Australia has switched to the metric system, Herman.

It has some advantages but constant meddling by the French and the 
others make the metric system one that frequently changes.

Many of the measurements are based on engineering principles and some on 
obviously logical premises like the centigrade degrees where 0 is the 
temperature at which water freezes at sea level and 100 the temperature 
at which water boils. That was logical and a semi-educated person could 
immediately twig to the logic by the name centigrade-100 gradients, but 
they fiddled that to and changed the name to Celsius which means nothing 
to me. Another slight problem there is the coarseness of the metric 
degree. So instead of round numbers (as is usual with the finer 
Fahrenheit system) we need to put decimal places in daily weather 
reports (for instance).

With other metric measurements, they have introduced hard to pronounce 
and spell wog names which I simply can't be bothered with such as Pascal 
as in kPa. And why should we be bothered with that kind of thing? They 
could have picked easy to remember or self explanatory names (like 
centigrade) but they chose to immortalize long dead people.

Then, still fiddling, they have changed the unit of measurement for 
torque and others to suit engineers but which are unintelligible to the 
reasonable man. They are more suited to engineering than everyday use.

I quite frankly can't be bothered referring back to formal sources but 
the hubris, vanity and even narcissism displayed by those mostly 
European people constantly fiddling with the metric system is mad 
useless, just what I expect from them. And I guess you know about one 
metric system of measurement based on the distance from the north pole 
to the equator via Paris.

Please spare me that silliness.

The US has simplified the old Imperial measurement system enough so that 
it works well. Simply not a problem, domestically and an extraordinarily 
high (by international standards) percentage of US production is 
consumed domestically.

And the continent that gave us the metric system is sinking of its own 
intellectual vanity and weight. They can't even reproduce. They are in a 
"death spiral" to use a common phrase and soon won't matter. The United 
States and China now power the world economy with Europe and Japan 
contributing little (except hot air and moral posturing on the part of 
Europe). And given China's massive internal problems, their vital 
contribution to the world economy could be seen as volatile.

It's quite possible that the US will eventually go metric, but there 
seems to be little movement in that direction to me, an occasional 
visitor to the US. Metric road signs and speedometer markings have all 
but disappeared in recent years and no one I spoke to in the US recently 
used or even knew metric measurements unless they were Mexican, Canadian 
or other foreigners.

And even though we have gone metric here in Oz we still stay 20', 40', 
48' and 53' for shipping container lengths, and still measure truck 
engine outputs in horsepower and lb ft of torque, and US thread, bolt, 
and nut sizes are still in wide use. And my new rainwater tanks are in 
gallons (with litres in the fine print).

The Anglosphere still seems quite comfortable with imperial measurements 
even those countries that have formally gone metric.


Reply via email to