[USMA:36582] Re: metric stands alone

[Phil Chernack]

You hit it right on the head when you said it would be thoroughly confusing to calculate fuel economy.  The only way to make it logical at this point is to give fuel economy in terms of liters per mile.  While certainly not desirable, it might be an interim step prior to converting road signs to metric.   Phil   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Millet Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 6:04 PM To: U.S. Metric Association Subject: [USMA:36581] Re: metric stands alone   With that in mind I wonder how the US public would react to buying gas by the liter? It'd be thoroughly confusing buying by the liter and calculating fuel efficiency in miles per gallon but at least you'd be using a metric measure when you buy it. I wrote the FMI which is the main organization blocking amending the FPLA and have yet to receive a reply but I'm still holding out hope Mike On 4/17/06, Paul Trusten, R.Ph. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In Albertson's last night, I saw a huge store display of 2 L Coca Cola bottles bearing a sign representing them as 2-liter bottles. There was no mention of fluid ounces or quarts on the sign. This matter-of-fact exclusive statement of the liter tells me that the liter is a part of U.S. psychology. I would think that the beverage makers would successfully exercise their metric-only option under an amended FPLA. Paul Trusten, R.Ph. U.S . Metric Association, Inc. Phone (432)528-7724 www.metric.org 3609 Caldera Boulevard, Apartment 122 Midland TX 79707-2872 USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] home.grandecom.net/~trusten