I'd venture a guess that the US dairy industry is a major source of
resistance to metrication.  Outside the occasional attempts at 3 L
milks, all sizes of milk and related products have stubbornly been
sized in customary measures.  The recent size reduction of ice-cream
is a perfect example: from 2 quarts to 1.75 quarts.  It could have
just gone to a metric amount, like 1.6 or 1.5 L.

BTW, from what I've seen in Canada, dairy is predominantly metric,
with 1 L, 0.5 L, and 250 mL milk containers.

Remek

On Nov 26, 2007 4:30 PM, Paul Trusten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  But, have we "got metric milk?"  I need to push more for quarts of milk in
> the U.S. to be changed to liters, which, after all, are a bit larger--54 mL
> larger, to be exact. Half-gallons could become 2-liter sizes. Anyone who has
> ever bought 2 L of soft drink without incident shouldn't be miffed by 2 L of
> milk. And, larger sizes? I guess 3 L and 4 L could be around the corner.
> Attached is a picture from an Aldi grocery store near Sydney, Australia,
> showing some milk sizes.
>
>
>
>  Nat Hager III wrote:
>
>  Same with me. In terms of liquid measure the US is pretty much metricated.
> I buy 2-Liter soda, Liter-and-a-half of wine, 700 mL water, half-liter
> mouthwash, 750 mL shampoo, 1.75 L OJ, 3-Liter detergent (never mind its only
> 2.95L), 1.65 L ice cream (never mind its also labeled 1.75 Qt), etc, etc.
>
> Also toilets are 6L/flush, which I notice this morning they're reducing to
> 5L (never mind the AP reports as 1.3 Gal)
>
> Nat
>
>
>  Countless experiments have shown that people tend to see what they are
> looking for. Let's imagine tourists in Burma who are trying to fend for
> their needs. They are going to be on the lookout for something that
> seems familiar and that speaks to them in a language they understand. If
> they are typical American tourists they can tell you of the many places
> where they saw familiar units being used and that they don't recall any
> other units. If they are tourists from almost any other country, they
> will assure you that they saw zillions of metric indications and few, if
> any, non-metric units.
>
> We see this often in the U.S. I've had folks swear up and down that they
> never see metric units used anywhere and then I have them read the
> contents indication on their can of pop or the nutrition information on
> their snack package. Indeed, sometimes I've asked people to read me what
> the label claims to be on the 500 mL bottle of water and they just read
> me the number of pints and floozies shown in parentheses, skipping right
> over the "500 mL" that appears first. Yes, they realize that those
> "other" units are metric. However they didn't "see" them until then and
> if they had seen them earlier it didn't register long enough to create a
> memory of that.
>
> I've had beginning students in Physics who, during our first lab which
> is on metric unit familiarization, would wave their rulers in the air
> and proudly tell us that the college bookstore sells only "inch rulers".
> I would ask them to tell me what's on the other edge of that ruler and
> they are amazed at what suddenly appears there--namely centimeters. They
> truly had not "noticed" the metric scale on those rulers.
>
> I'm on the lookout for metric usage, so I see it quite often in the U.S.
> Pat Naughtin has seen them here quite often as well, but he's a "metric
> tourist" over here, so his eye gravitates to units with which he's
> familiar. Non-metric people who live here rarely "see" what we see.
> Actually they do see those metric units, but they don't notice them and
> the experience does not register.
>
> Jim
>
> Ezra Steinberg wrote:
>
>
>  Well, I would certainly take your direct observations as gold, Michael.
>
> I guess I don't undestand why the folks who posted replies to my query
> on the Thorn Tree site would say otherwise.
> Since it's a site for world travelers to help each other with questions
> and issues, I assumed the posters were recent travelers to Burma,
> themselves.
>
> Ah, well ... let the confusion begin! ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> Ezra
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Payne"
>
>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>  To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 8:09 AM
> Subject: [USMA:39765] Re: Burma still using English units, it seems
>
>
>
>
>  This contradicts my direct observation while I visited Burma in 1997,
> speedometers in cars I drove in were km/h and speed limits were
> (according to my driver) km/h but written in the local Burmese
> numerical script which was undecipherable to me, I asked out driver
> what the speed limit was, he told me the answer as ** km/h. I did see
> a Gas (Petrol) station with very old pumps that displayed in Imperial
> Gallons. The Burmese just seem to accept what's thrown at them, I
> doubt they import vehicles exclusively from the US, we have sanctions,
> so they come from neighboring countries which are exclusively metric,
> would not do much good to have mph speed limits when every car in the
> last 30 years has only km/h on the speedometer. If some piece of
> equipment comes from the US despite sanctions, they'll probably accept
> it as is. Fact is sanctions by the US against Burma are probably
> leading to less US units being seen there on any equipment.
>
> Michael Payne
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ezra Steinberg"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, 25 November 2007 06:15
> Subject: [USMA:39764] Burma still using English units, it seems
>
>
> USMA folks:
>
> I posted a couple of queries on a well-known travel site (Thorn Tree)
> that seems to get a lot of traffic from Europeans.
> I asked about the metric vs. Imperial situation in Burma (Myanmar) and
> Liberia, the two countries often cited aside from the USA as still
> using mostly Imperial.
>
> No replies about Liberia (and I may not get any), but I got several
> quick replies about Burma. These confirm that on road signs and in the
> street Imperial is used exclusively.
>
> Not earth-shattering news, to be sure, but at least it's up-to-date
> first-hand information from recent visitors there.
>
> Ezra
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to