Pat,

Your post is the best argument I've read in favor of using ONLY metric units in
recipes, whether those recipes are for a meal or for a compounded prescription.

Quoting Pat Naughtin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> On 2008/01/30, at 2:06 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> > On the other hand, "T" is often used here as a unit of volume. I
> > have often
> > wondered what happens when you add a tesla of salt to a coulomb of
> > boiling
> > water. ;)
> >
> > Pierre
>
>
> Dear Pierre and All,
>
> In the article, 'Metric cooking with confidence', Wendy and I use the
> conventions that ts is an abbreviation for teaspoon and that TS is an
> abbreviation for tablespoon. They are defined using the Australian
> values as:
>
> 1 teaspoon = 1 ts = 5 millilitres = 5 mL
> 1 tablespoon = 1 TS = 20 millilitres = 20 mL
>
> We also use a running footer in our cookbooks so that people don't
> forget, and so that readers in the UK and in the USA will remember
> that the Australian tablespoon = 20 mL not 15 mL.
>
> As for c for cup, the issue here is even more complex. We wrote:
>
> Cups
> Even something as simple sounding as a cup of flour is fraught with
> difficulty. Do you use an English teacup, a breakfast cup, a morning
> coffee cup, or an after dinner coffee cup? If you receive a recipe
> from the USA does a cup mean that you should use a teacup, a
> breakfast cup, or your old coffee mug with the broken handle that has
> 'I luv N.Y.' printed on the side? And we haven't even considered
> whether an after dinner coffee cup is the same as a demitasse!
>
> Compare all of these with the simplicity of the Australian metric cup
> that always contains 250 millilitres. This means that there are four
> cups to one litre. The complete set of information an Australian cook
> needs to know about cups is:
> 1 cup = 250 millilitres (this is added to the running footer as
> mentioned above.
> 4 cups = 1000 millilitres = 1 litre
>
> See: http://www.metricationmatters.com/docs/
> MetricCookingWithConfidence.pdf to put this information into context.
>
> After studying many cookbooks from the UK and in the USA it seems
> that their editors mostly use 15 mL for a tablespoon and 5 mL for a
> teaspoon with a wide range of choices, including T and t, as
> abbreviations for tablespoon and teaspoon respectively. In making
> their choices we think that these editors have simply taken the
> tablespoon as an approximation for half an old fluid ounce (UK fl.
> oz. in the UK and USA fl. oz. in the USA) and given them some ill-
> fitting metric clothing.
>
> The USDA defines a cup as 8 fluid ounces or 48 teaspoons or 16
> tablespoons. The UK does it differently because they had different
> ounces (20 fl. oz. = 1 pint in the UK while 16 fl. oz. = 1 pint in
> the USA).
>
> In Australia, we have to be aware that recipes from the UK and the
> USA have all of these these differences.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Pat Naughtin
>
> PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,
> Geelong, Australia
> Phone: 61 3 5241 2008
>
> Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has
> helped thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the
> modern metric system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they
> now save thousands each year when buying, processing, or selling for
> their businesses. Pat provides services and resources for many
> different trades, crafts, and professions for commercial, industrial
> and government metrication leaders in Asia, Europe, and in the USA.
> Pat's clients include the Australian Government, Google, NASA, NIST,
> and the metric associations of Canada, the UK, and the USA. See
> http://www.metricationmatters.com/ for more metrication information,
> contact Pat at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or subscribe to
> the free 'Metrication matters' newsletter at http://
> www.metricationmatters.com/newsletter/
>
>


--

Reply via email to