That's why unit-pricing is so important, and consumer and consumer protection 
organizations strongly the advocate  the use of unit-pricing.
Stan Doore
 


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Carleton MacDonald 
  To: U.S. Metric Association 
  Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 9:35 PM
  Subject: [USMA:40365] Re: No more 'horsepower' on small engines in USA


  That's actually a very good question.

  cm

   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: John Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 20:58
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: U.S. Metric Association
  Subject: Re: [USMA:40364] Re: No more 'horsepower' on small engines in USA

   

  In this case, then why aren't television and computer screen sizes marketed 
in centimeters?

  Carleton MacDonald wrote: 

It's the same reason why Canadian and UK merchants still want to promotepricing 
by the pound. The horsepower is smaller than the kilowatt.  So if you can 
advertise yourcar in horsepower, the number is bigger.  Size matters. The pound 
is smaller than the kilogram.  So if you can advertise your applesor steak by 
the pound, the price is smaller.  Size still matters. It's all about 
marketeering. Carleton -----Original Message-----From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On BehalfOf Ziser, JesseSent: Sunday, February 03, 
2008 16:16To: U.S. Metric AssociationSubject: [USMA:40360] Re: No more 
'horsepower' on small engines in USA Hmm... poundal-acre-fortnights per 
gry-year, perhaps?  (1 PAFPGY = 0.0489 Nm) I doubt we'll see engine power in 
sane units in the US for a long, longtime.  "Horsepower" is acompound of two 
"manly" words, besides which automakers seem to benefit fromtricking 
theircustomers into thinking that the car is literally the equivalent of so 
many"horses", even to theextent of advertising using that word.  Too bad it's a 
lie (1 HP is not thepower produced by onehorse). --- Remek Kocz <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> wrote:   Judging by this article, though, it looks like they're 
doing the next    worst  thing: torque.  I'll let you take a guess what units 
they'd standardize    on.  Hint: it's not newton meters. Remek On Feb 1, 2008 
7:33 PM, Michael G. Koerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:      From the 2008-02-01 
Milwaukee, WI Journal-Sentinal (ran on the front      page  below the fold): 
http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=713480 "Seems the term, 
'horsepower' is going the way of the buggy By RICK [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Jan. 31, 
2008 When you buy lawn and garden equipment this spring, a familiar old term    
  -  horsepower - will be missing from many engines. Blame it on lawyers, or 
engine makers who might have fudged the numbers,buthorsepower is no longer the 
gold standard for small gasoline engines. Sears, for example, now advertises 
some lawn mowers rated by horsepower,others by torque, and still others by 
cubic centimeters. And some mowershaveno such designation at all. 
"Unfortunately, we are not giving consumers the answers they want," 
saidBillRotter, an owner of National Ace Hardware stores in the Milwaukee area. 
There's no longer a horsepower rating for many Briggs & Stratton      engines.  
Lastyear, Briggs chose torque as its rating system for push mowers, 
snowthrowers,pressure washers and generators." (See link for rest of article) 
No mention of watts, but it appears to be a start. 
--___________________________________________  ____ _______________Regards,     
                               |    |\    ____                                  
          |    | |  |    |\Michael G. Koerner               May they   |    | | 
 |    | |   riseagain!Appleton, Wisconsin USA                     |    | |  |   
 | |___________________________________________ |    | |  |    | 
|_______________            
____________________________________________________________________________________Be
 a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it 
now.http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ       

Reply via email to