Good talking points. Also, correspondence with a U.S. organization,
especially for spelling, should use U.S. spellings such as ³meter² to avoid
appearing foreign. 



From: STANLEY DOORE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:56:53 -0400
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:40561] NMP 2008 Final Report

    The National Mathematics Advisory Panel (NMP), on March 13,  approved
and presented to Education Secretary Spellings its 2008 Final Report titled
Foundations for Success.  I was there.
 
    The Report, as far as I can tell,  makes no mention of the International
System of Units (SI) or going metric.  This strongly indicates that the SI
should be taught and used in  science courses and classes.  The USMA
President and I provided written testimony at the NMP's first meeting two
years ago at the national Academy of Sciences.  We suggested metric be
included.  I provided additional written comments then and for later NMP
meetings.
 
    The NMP says that "real-world contexts to introduce mathematical ideas
has been advocated ...."  However, the SI, which most of the world uses, has
been omitted.
 
    The NMP establishes "Critical Foundations for Algebra."  They are:
        Fluency with Whole Numbers
        Fluency with Fractions
        Particular Aspects of Geometry and Measurement
 
    The NMP recommends "A focused, coherent progression of mathematics
learning, with an emphasis on proficiency with key topics should become the
norm in elementary and middle school mathematics curricula"  Computational
proficiency includes the development of automatic recall for addition,
subtraction, multiplication and division and related facts.  The NMP also
said that an "integrated approach" is needed to avoid difficulties in taking
advanced mathematics course work.
 
    These recommendations are consistent with the need for the United States
to convert to the metric system since the SI is a coherent and integrated
system of measurement.  Computational efficiency and integration is
fundamental with the International System of Units since the SI is much
easier to use.
 
    For example:  1 mm of rainfall in one square metre equals 1 L of water
which has a mass of 1 kg.  Therefore, 1000 mm of rain equals 1 kL (1000
litres or one cubic metre) which has a mass of one metric ton.  The is an
everyday example of the utility, simplicity and integration of the SI.
 
    The NMP is correct in not including a specific systems of measurement to
ensure the universality of mathematics.  However, it would have been
appropriate to suggest adopting the SI to help show how computational
proficiency, coherence and understanding can be improved.  The
recommendations for mathematics are similar to those needed to adopt the
metric (SI) system.
 
    Since the US has impeded the use of the SI by continuing to use
non-metric systems of measurement, it is one reason why coherence,
integration and understanding are lacking and the US is rated behind other
countries.  The SI is far easier for automatic recall which the NMP says is
needed for computation.  I learned this type of automatic recall for
addition, subtraction, multiplication and division in the third grade.  Now
it's delayed until the fourth grade.
 
    The NMP recommends  that high-quality computer-assisted  instruction
(CAI) "be considered as a useful tool in developing  students'
automaticity."  However, there is no mention of portable handheld devices
which would allow learning "Any Time in Any Place on Any Path at Any Pace."
for students, parents, tutors, and teachers alike.
 
    The NMP does mention that textbooks should be smaller, but why not use
current technology which can provide substantially more learning capability
at less cost.  It is easier to update or to expand applications and
graphics?  MIT has done it for less developed countries.  The NMP says that
CAI "well designed and implemented can have a positive impact on mathematics
performance"  Agreed.  My granddaughter used CAI on her father's computer
when she was four years old, yet first and second grade teachers I have
spoken with said that children that age are too young.
 
Regards,  Stan Doore
 


Reply via email to