I do indeed have the magazine, Norm. Thanks for pointing that out, though,
as I don't always read Time from cover to cover and would have missed that
one.
 
One thing that article and another one one page 53 remind me about is that
fact that I've always found the use of bbl as the abbreviation or symbol for
barrel very annoying. It looks more like an abbreviation of bubble -- which
may, in fact, be more appropriate these days.
 
Bill


  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Norman & Nancy Werling
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 09:56
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:41052] Time magazine, June 16, 2008, page 20, "A Brief
History of:The Oil Barrel"


If you have the magazine, I commend the subject article for your reading.
It was the old whisky barrel that became the measure of crude oil in the
United States.  The article explains that Japan measures crude oil in
kiloliters and Russia measures it in metric tons (tonnes).
 
An excerpt includes this, "1866--Oil companies agree to standard barrel
size, 42 gal. (160 L) for tax purposes."  In a posting I made about two
weeks ago, I mentioned that Time includes SI-metric terms within parentheses
with usually reasonable approximations.  
 
In this case, the exact calculation would have been 158.9872956 L (3.7854118
times 42) which would have been ridiculous if shown to such a degree of
accuracy.   It would have been negative toward promoting acceptance of
SI-metric.
 
Norm Werling

Reply via email to