The use of the SI prefixes would be natural since they are used in many other applications: terabyte, megabits, etc.etc.
   Stan Doore



----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Trusten, R.Ph." <[email protected]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Cc: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 5:42 PM
Subject: [USMA:42277] Re: Ed-week



In my hometown newspaper, today's editorial and one op-ed piece decried the bandying-about of "trillions" of dollars. Why not start applying SI prefixes to these sums of money? Anybody got a teradollar or two? In terms of the national
debt, that sounds less ominous.

Quoting STANLEY DOORE <[email protected]>:

The US education establishment likes to use sophisticated words like metric and metrics without understanding what the words really mean, or, they use changes of commonly used words to something similar to hide the real meaning.
    Stan Doore

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Norman & Nancy Werling
  To: U.S. Metric Association
  Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 5:05 PM
  Subject: [USMA:42274] Re: Ed-week


  Pat,

I find it fascinating that many American professionals of many persuations
continually use the word "metric" in the sense of "defining measures of
success, etc." when referring to many topics.   But these same
professionals--and I use the word loosely--continue to change meters to
yards.  I continue to feel that it is the media who are most guilty with
regard to changing SI terms to USC.

  On January 8  Pat Naughton wrote:

    Subject: [USMA:42272] Ed-week


    Dear All,


I happened on this web site at http://www.edweek.org/ew/index.html and thought that they might have some thoughts on metric system education in the USA. However, a search for the words metric system (without quotes) resulted in 4 references that referred to system and systems and that used the word metric and metrics only in the sense of using the right metrics or choosing
another metric.


    It would appear that the metric system has not been thought worthy of
consideration by these magazines in the last 12 months.


    For information about who runs this web site go to
http://www.edweek.org/info/about/


    Cheers,
    Pat Naughtin


    PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,
    Geelong, Australia
    Phone: 61 3 5241 2008


Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands
each year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat
provides services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and
professions for commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in
Asia, Europe, and in the USA. Pat's clients include the Australian
Government, Google, NASA, NIST, and the metric associations of Canada, the UK, and the USA. See http://www.metricationmatters.com for more metrication information, contact Pat at [email protected] or to get the
free 'Metrication matters' newsletter go to:
http://www.metricationmatters.com/newsletter to subscribe.




--



Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
Public Relations Director
U.S. Metric Association (USMA), Inc.
www.metric.org
3609 Caldera Boulevard, Apartment 122
Midland TX 79707-2872 US
+1(432)528-7724
mailto:[email protected]


Reply via email to