Actually, a pole is close to 10 feet (ish). I received a book for Christmas 
called "Measure for Measure." It includes thousands of different measurements 
and ways to convert them, usually into metric. The authors are definitely 
pro-metric and include a lengthy section on the metric system in the beginning.

Anyway, it lists all the measurements, and the pole is in there. It says a pole 
is about
16.500 033 international feet, and 16.5 US survey feet. So close to 10. Not 
sure exactly where the saying came from, though.

This is such a great little book. Just for fun:

1 poisson (France) is 0.116 liters
1 khub (Laos) is 20 centimeters
1 metical (Tunisia) is 3.936 grams
1 metze (Hungary) is 53.3 liters

This just highlights the measurement problem even more. It's not just the 
English system that is all over the place, it's every other system ever 
created. But it's still interesting for historical purposes.

--- On Sun, 1/11/09, Bill Potts <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Bill Potts <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:42300] Re: the metric system, bureaucracy, and, uh, sodomy?
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Date: Sunday, January 11, 2009, 3:37 AM



 
Oh, I 
knew a pole was not ten feet. However, my mind just went off on a 
tangent.
 
Brain 
fart.
 
Bill




Bill Potts
WFP Consulting
Roseville, 
CA
http://metric1.org [SI Navigator] 



  
  
  From: [email protected] 
  [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David
Sent: 
  Saturday, January 10, 2009 11:14
To: U.S. Metric 
  Association
Subject: [USMA:42294] Re: the metric system, 
  bureaucracy, and, uh, sodomy?


  
  
    
    
      I forgot about the pole as a unit of measure. But I think 
        they were referring to the "10-foot pole" saying, since 10 feet is 
3.048 
        meters. I was just joking about soft metrication. Had that been some 
        kind of product or good, they would round it down to a nice 3 
        meters.

--- On Sat, 1/10/09, Bill Potts 
        <[email protected]> wrote:

        From: 
          Bill Potts <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:42290] Re: 
          the metric system, bureaucracy, and, uh, sodomy?
To: "U.S. Metric 
          Association" <[email protected]>
Date: Saturday, January 10, 
          2009, 6:53 PM


          
          
          As a unit of measure, the pole would disappear completely 
          (although I think it probably already has).
           
          "I wouldn't touch that with a ten-foot pole" should 
          remain, unaltered, as the metaphor it always was, along with 
          "seven-league boots" and non-metaphorical names like inch worm. 
Idiots 
          like Hannity can't see beyond conversion tables and don't (or won't) 
          understand that, in any case, there's no point it trying to convert 
          rough estimates using absolute precision. My suggestion that 
          he (and others like him) won't understand 
          it is because he's simply a blow-hard alarmist who will say anything, 
          however stupid, to make (or believe he's making) his 
          point.
           
          Bill 
          
          
          
          
          Bill Potts
          WFP Consulting
Roseville, 
          CA
http://metric1.org [SI Navigator] 

          
            
            
            From: [email protected] 
            [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
            David
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 
            10:18
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: 
            [USMA:42288] Re: the metric system, bureaucracy, and, uh, 
            sodomy?


            
            
              
              
                Yeah, I saw that. That's such a shame, because 
                  they're really grasping at straws. The metric system is fine 
                  in day-to-day life. People think meters are too big? Every 
                  person in every other country would think feet are too small. 
                  And if metrication were done correctly the pole would be 
                  rounded down to 3 meters. ;)

People always tell me that 
                  we shouldn't transition because people don't want it, but I 
                  say that people don't know what they want. If people were 
                  educated about the metric system, and I mean everyone and not 
                  just students, then the stigma would go away.

--- On 
                  Sat, 1/10/09, Victor Jockin 
                  <[email protected]> wrote:

                  From: 
                    Victor Jockin <[email protected]>
Subject: 
                    [USMA:42287] Re: the metric system, bureaucracy, and, uh, 
                    sodomy?
To: "U.S. Metric Association" 
                    <[email protected]>
Date: Saturday, January 10, 
                    2009, 6:07 PM


                    
                    

                    Here's another amusing one that I found on 
                    the Hannity forum that Paul mentioned a while back.  
                    Maybe some of you saw it:
                    
                    
                      Every country that uses metrics is 
                      either Socialist, Fascist or Communist. I don't want to 
                      give up our Republican form of government just so some 
                      engineers don't have to use a calculator. Metricfied 
                      expressions like: "I wouldn't touch that with a 3.048 
                      meter pole" doesn't make sense and seems dumb to say. 
What 
                      about membership in the "1760 Meter High Club"? It sounds 
                      stupid!

Say NO to metrics!
                    There's a pretty strong positive 
                    relationship between support for metrication and 
educational 
                    attainment.  Also, social conservatives are generally 
                    fearful of instability or change.  Those two attributes 
                    -- low intelligence, and a belief the world is full of 
scary 
                    people who must be stopped -- produces some hilarious 
                    prose.  Now if only there were fewer such people out 
                    there.
                      
                    
                    

                    
                    From: Paul Trusten 
                    Sent: 01/10/2009 9:30 AM
                    To: U.S. Metric Association 
                    Subject: [USMA:42286] the metric system, 
                    bureaucracy, and, uh, sodomy?
                    

                    What we'll be confronting as U.S. metrication 
                    approaches--extracted from a corner of Facebook:
                     
                    WHY PEOPLE HATE IT

There is 
                    a good reason why people only adopt the metric system when 
                    they are forced to by unjust, bureaucratic 
                    governments:

Because it is inferior, for day-to-day 
                    use. Systems which naturally evolved for the convenience of 
                    the user are almost always better than systems set up by 
                    ivory tower academics, and this is a perfect example of 
                    that.

                     
                    
                    
                      
                      
                        

                        
                          
                            
                            
                              
                                Virginia D. 
                                Templeton 
                                wrote
at 3:34pm on January 6th, 
                                2009
                                The 
                                metric system is of the Devil. It was, after 
                                all, created by a cabal of God-hating French 
                                sodomites to make their genitalia sound bigger 
                                when bragging to potential same-sex "lovers" 
                                with the hope of picking them up for a night of 
                                wicked, debauched, feces-smeared buggery in the 
                                back room of some rat-infested "fromagerie." 
God 
                                hates it.
                                 
                                I just thought I'd offer 
                                this up, because there are a lot of people in 
                                the U.S. who missed, or preferred to miss, the 
                                entire 1970s U.S. metrication movement, and 
will 
                                find 21st-century metrication just as 
                                objectionable, with the old religious and 
                                armchair-mathematics objections 
                                resurfacing.   Unfortunately, "metric 
                                system" is a phrase that is still used either 
as 
                                a threat or as a joke among Americans. We shall 
                                need strong leadership to take us to our 
                                goal.
                    Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
Public Relations 
                    Director
U.S. Metric Association, Inc.
www.metric.org    
3609 
                    Caldera Blvd. Apt. 122
Midland TX 79707-2872 
                    US
+1(432)528-7724
[email protected]





      

Reply via email to