Paul,

This is scary!  You are telling me that some doctors do it one way that is 
different from the norm.  Then nurses have to call for interpretation.  I would 
hope that this doesn't extend into the mis-application of drugs.  Someone could 
get killed.  For patient safety, I personally don't care which units are used 
as long as everyone is using the same ones. 

If metric units are the primary standard in medicine, then there should be a 
law that it is used everywhere and at all times.  I'm surprised there isn't one 
by now.

Jerry 




________________________________
From: Paul Trusten <[email protected]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 11:13:53 AM
Subject: [USMA:42447] temperature scale in U.S. healthcare


Jerry et al, relax;, not scary at all. I am certain that the right things get 
done to protect the patient without a hitch.  Unfortunately from our 
perspective, virtually all treatment and discussion of body temperature in the 
U.S. is done in Fahrenheit degrees. But, nobody's fever is missed.. 

Not being able to think Celsius is not yet a job prerequisite in healthcare.  
In our hospital, there are only one or two physicians who use Celsius 
temperature in their dosing parameters, and interpretation in Fahrenheit is 
only a phone call away if nurses don't have a conversion chart. Of course,  
converting away from metric units is total anathema to the process of 
metrication, but here's the sad truth--we in the U.S. are not metricating yet. 
True metrication comes when SI is announced to be the only standard in effect 
by a certain date; when all people involved are educated in that standard, and 
when SI-only equipment is available to measure the values. If we are talking 
about Celsius, then we want everything done in Celsius---treatment principles 
based upon it, staff knowing it, instruments recording in it, and records kept 
in it. Successful metrication does not require changing just one of these 
things. Successful metricaton requires
 changing all of these things.

Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
Public Relations Director
U.S. Metric Association (USMA), Inc.
www.metric.org
3609 Caldera Boulevard, Apartment 122
Midland TX 79707-2872 US
+1(432)528-7724
mailto:[email protected]




----- Original Message ----- 
From: Jeremiah MacGregor 
To: U.S. Metric Association 
Sent: 24 January, 2009 08:35
Subject: [USMA:42426] Re: Is there any literature on metrication in the US 
aimed at immigrants?

Paul,

If there are no Celsius fever thermometers in the house, then why not order 
some?  

If a nurse doesn't know what 38 means, then should she be practicing?  She is 
liable to make a mistake that costs someone their life.  

Can't you just tell them that 38 is one degree above normal or supply them with 
a Celsius thermometer?  

This whole situation sounds very scary.  It is surprising that the hospitals 
are this careless.  One would think they should know better.

What is wrong with teaspoons, are they not equal to 5 mL exactly?

Jerry




________________________________
From: "Paul Trusten, R.Ph." <[email protected]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Cc: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 4:39:48 PM
Subject: [USMA:42356] Re: Is there any literature on metrication in the US 
aimed at immigrants?


Pierre, in the absence of real-world U.S. metrication, it's hard to suggest
people to use metric here, even in the healthcare world itself. One of the
doctors in my hospital orders antipyretic (anti-fever) medication with the
parameter "if temperature over 38." Not sure if he is aware that there isn't a
single Celsius fever thermometer in the house, or, if switchable, I'm sure they
are not switched over to Celsius because all the charting is done in Fahrenheit.
I've had nurses calling me to ask what "38" means, and I have no choice but to
commit metrication sin and back-convert for them. Even physicians who were
trained abroad--which means metric countries, of course--end up following my
pet peeve of ordering oral liquid medications in teaspoon volumes instead of
milliliter volumes, but all orders for such are expressed on the record as
milliliters. As a U.S. medical tool, the teaspoon should go the way of the iron
lung.

Metrication is a truly national, societal process. Clinical temperature
measurement is a good example. To TRULY change to Celsius fever measurement in
a U.S. institution, you need ALL of the following:

1)Celsius orders
2)Celsius thermometers
3)Celsius-educated staff

Still, I do think that the issue of how immigrants to the U.S. feel about metric
has scarcely been explored. Thank you for suggesting it. I'll look into it.



Paul T.

However, at every opportunity, I have spearheaded the sole use of metric at my
facility
Quoting Pierre Abbat <[email protected]>:

>
> The church yesterday held a health screening where they checked our
> cholesterol, glucose, and other signs. After getting my blood glucose
> checked, I went to another station which had a digital scale (pèse-personne).
> I stepped on it and it showed my mass in pounds, which is meaningless to me,
> since I have always thought of it in kilograms since I was 36 kg when they
> introduced metric in school. The nurse then tried to divide by 2.2 in her
> head and got it wrong. I volunteered my calculator, which has the conversion
> built in; she entered the numbers and got 0, because it's reverse Polish,
> which she's unfamiliar with.
>
> After everyone else had been weighed, I turned the scale over, flipped the
> switch, stepped on it, and read 56.8, which agrees with my mass measured at
> home, considering that I was wearing clothes. I know she is familiar with
> kilograms because (1) she's an immigrant; (2) I overheard her explaining to
> the previous patient that you divide your mass in kilograms by the square of
> your height in meters; and (3) I talked with her after flipping the switch.
>
> It appears that the immigrants try to conform to what they think is the way
> we
> do it. Is there any literature aimed at people who come here already knowing
> metric, but haven't lived through the introduction of metric in the 1970s,
> empowering them to push Americans to metricate?
>
> Pierre
>
>


--


      

Reply via email to