I think he works mainly on railroad projects, which due to legacy concerns are pretty much in colonial units.
cm From: owner-u...@colostate.edu [mailto:owner-u...@colostate.edu] On Behalf Of John M. Steele Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 11:16 To: U.S. Metric Association Subject: [USMA:43412] RE: Mistaken blather from a correspondent on another list If he is "very conservative," he no doubt favors very literal interpretation of the Constitution (especially 1st and 2nd amendments) and decries liberal judges who interpret to other than what it says. Soooo, how does he feel about the section that grants Congress the say in establishing the system of weights & measures. As a civil engineer, how does he (and his company?) feel about participating in purely Federal construction projects, which are specified to be metric. Do they no-bid? --- On Sat, 3/7/09, Carleton MacDonald <carlet...@comcast.net> wrote: From: Carleton MacDonald <carlet...@comcast.net> Subject: [USMA:43407] RE: Mistaken blather from a correspondent on another list To: "U.S. Metric Association" <usma@colostate.edu> Date: Saturday, March 7, 2009, 10:44 AM Domestic civil engineering. From: Jeremiah MacGregor [mailto:jeremiahmacgre...@rocketmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 21:32 To: carlet...@comcast.net; U.S. Metric Association Subject: Re: [USMA:43390] RE: Mistaken blather from a correspondent on another list What kind of engineer? As an engineer he is the most likely person in a company to encounter customer wishes. In a global economy the chances of encountering English units only is non-existent. On the other end of the spectrum he also has to contend with goods and services that are all metric even if some may hide behind English conversions. Trying to design a product in English units and having to incorporate products that are fully metric can present problems, especially if your thinking is obsolete. It would be interesting know what he does and how much metric he encounters daily. Jerry _____ From: Carleton MacDonald <carlet...@comcast.net> To: U.S. Metric Association <usma@colostate.edu> Sent: Friday, March 6, 2009 9:10:02 PM Subject: [USMA:43390] RE: Mistaken blather from a correspondent on another list He's an engineer. The kind that designs, not that drives trains. From: Jeremiah MacGregor [mailto:jeremiahmacgre...@rocketmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 21:04 To: carlet...@comcast.net; U.S. Metric Association Subject: Re: [USMA:43388] RE: Mistaken blather from a correspondent on another list But so far the government hasn't really become involved to a point that affects consumers. Whatever metric we encounter comes from the free choice of people. For example, did the government force any industry to go metric? Yet, there are those who have freely chosen to do so. Or does he still insist the government had a hand in it? I wonder what type of work he does and what he would tell a paying customer if the customer insisted he speak metric to them or provide metric information for them. Do you know what kind of work he does? Jerry _____ From: Carleton MacDonald <carlet...@comcast.net> To: U.S. Metric Association <usma@colostate.edu> Sent: Friday, March 6, 2009 8:52:56 PM Subject: [USMA:43388] RE: Mistaken blather from a correspondent on another list No, he's just very, very conservative. The idea that "gummint" could "tell him what to do" is anathema. And that trumps any benefit that going metric may have. Carleton From: Jeremiah MacGregor [mailto:jeremiahmacgre...@rocketmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 18:58 To: carlet...@comcast.net; U..S. Metric Association Subject: Re: [USMA:43256] Mistaken blather from a correspondent on another list What exactly is this guy's problem with the metric system? He seems to know it so it can't be unfamiliarity. Did he work for a company that switched to metric and he opposed and they fired him and now he is taking it out on the whole system? Jerry _____ From: Carleton MacDonald <carlet...@comcast.net> To: U.S. Metric Association <usma@colostate.edu> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 12:54:05 AM Subject: [USMA:43256] Mistaken blather from a correspondent on another list On a passenger railroad-oriented list to which I also belong, an article was quoted which included mention of "kph". I pointed this out, and received this reply from another list member who in the past has espoused very conservative opinions. Fire away, all.. Carleton From: <mailto:All_Aboard%40yahoogroups.com> all_abo...@yahoogroups.com On Behalf Of abyler Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 22:47 To: <mailto:All_Aboard%40yahoogroups.com> all_abo...@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [A_A] Full steam ahead for California bullet train --- In <mailto:All_Aboard%40yahoogroups.com> all_abo...@yahoogroups.com, "Carleton MacDonald" wrote: > > Also, the speed is expressed incorrectly - it should be "350 km/h" - there > is no such thing as a "kph". [his answer:] Sure there is.. Its not like km/h is a normal SI measurement. The silly and useless SI Metric system would insist on us using m/s. kph is the colloquial Anglosphere abbreviation for kilmoeters per hour.. Kilometers per hour is just a bastardized bending of metric system rules to accomodate something like a traditional customary speed measurement most people can relate to and actually use, just like the metric "pound" (= 1/2kg); "livre" in France, "pfund" in Germany, "pond" in the Netherlands and Flanders, "libra" in Iberia and Italy, "jin" in China; and the metric "ton" (=1000 kg); the metric cup (=250 mL); the metric teaspoon (=5 mL); the metric horsepower (750 kgf-m/s). See, that's the problem with the SI metric system compared to English customary units which is based on normal and practical human experience instead of esoteric physics. People cannot relate to the true SI metric units for most applications, so they don't use them. Just one more reason so many railways systems (and international aviation and shipping and meterology) have stuck with English units or older versions of metric where the units make more sense for engineering purposes and practical thinking by human beings.
