Re: [USMA:48045] Re: KG3U unitsI still prefer SAMS (Stone Age Measurements).  
Short neat acronym.

John F-L
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Patrick Moore 
  To: U.S. Metric Association 
  Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 1:44 PM
  Subject: [USMA:48053] Re: KG3U units


  In science and engineering publications, I call the WOMBAT units "obsolete," 
"old-fashioned," "old," or "disfavored." The words "U.S." and "customary" are 
misleading and do the public a disservice by giving positive associations to 
bad habits. For the same reasons, I would never call them "traditional" or a 
"system."


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: Paul Trusten <trus...@grandecom.net>
  Reply-To: <trus...@grandecom.net>
  Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2010 22:52:19 -0500
  To: "U.S. Metric Association" <usma@colostate.edu>
  Subject: [USMA:48045] Re: KG3U units

  IMHO, John, I have decided to call them nothing more than traditional 
measurement units. The U.S. has already declared officially its preference for 
metric (Metric Conversion Act of 1975 as amended 1988), and had already defined 
legally these traditional units in metric terms (Mendelhall Order, 1893). No 
nation need claim the old units as their own. Personally, I have stopped using 
the expression "U.S. customary units." 
   
  Paul


    ----- Original Message ----- 
     
    From:  John M. Steele <mailto:jmsteele9...@sbcglobal.net>  
     
    To: U.S. Metric Association <mailto:usma@colostate.edu>  
     
    Sent: 04 July, 2010 10:11
     
    Subject: [USMA:48034] KG3U units
     

     

    In honor of Independence Day, I think the "battle" of what to call US  
traditional units (Customary, WOMBAT, etc) should be decided in favor of King  
George III Units (KG3U).  I don't wish to stir up any anti-British  feelings 
here, but lets face it, WE didn't like King George.
     
     
     
    It is historically accurate as the US "locked in" various units that  
pre-date the improvements of the Imperial system in 1824.  The  definitions of 
the Queen Anne or wine gallon and Winchester or corn bushel  were apparently 
redefined in 1707 by an Act of Parliament, and used at the  time of the 
Revolution.
     
    (The cubic measures, 231 in" and 2150.42 in" were  previously cylindrical 
measure, diameter and height; rounding produced  small value changes).
     
     
     
    Our metric idiots frequently cry out "We don't need no foreign  rulers."  
KG3U is a good reminder that we measure using the foreign ruler  of the very 
foreign ruler we overthrew in 1776.  So, if we really don't  need foreign 
rulers, KG3U represents EXACTLY what we don't need.   Complete the Revolution, 
throw out KG3U!
     
     
     
    The obvious alternative to King George III Units is the modern  
International System of Units (SI).  Yes, the early metric system was  
developed by the French and others (remember, they were our allies in the  
Revolutionary War).  However, development of the SI is overseen by  democratic 
processes among those nations (including the US) who signed the  Treaty of the 
Meter (either 1875, the initial treat as we did, or at some  later day).  As it 
is created democratically, not imposed by a King, and  we like democracy, we 
should like and fully adopt the SI.  Throw out the  foreign ruler, throw out 
KG3U.


Reply via email to