We don't really want to discredit anyone.  We want the metric system to win on 
its own merits, which it will do.

From: owner-u...@colostate.edu [mailto:owner-u...@colostate.edu] On Behalf Of 
mechtly, eugene a
Sent: Thursday, 07 March 2013 11:46
To: U.S. Metric Association
Cc: Trusten Paul; U.S. Metric Accociation
Subject: [USMA:52462] RE: ACWM

Thanks to m. f. Moon for digging out the names of ACWM participants.

What can we do to discredit the ACWM opposition to metrication?

Eugene Mechtly
________________________________
From: Kilopascal [kilopas...@cox.net]
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 6:02 PM
To: m. f. moon
Cc: Trusten Paul; Mechtly Gene
Subject: Re: ACWM
Thanks Mr Moon for this info.  They may be all hot air, but the USMA shouldn't 
take the chance.  If we try to convince people to go metric, we can't afford to 
have them work against us.  But it is good to know these facts because we can 
work it into our favour.

Here is what I could find on Seaver W Leslie, he is 66

http://www.whitepages.com/name/Seaver-W-Leslie/Wiscasset-ME/7w60qkm

http://www.ussearch.com/consumer/people-search/names/me+brunswick/seaver/leslie.html?adID=204-0000000006

White pages says he lives in Wiscasset and Zabasearch says Brunswick.  The two 
towns are 30 km apart.

There are two listing for Peter J Seymour, which indicates about 5 years ago he 
moved from Randolph, ME to Portland.  He is 59.

http://www.whitepages.com/name/peter-seymour/Wiscasset-ME

Take Care



From: m. f. moon<mailto:jayhawk...@usa.net>
Sent: Sunday, 2013-03-03 13:51
To: Kilopascal<mailto:kilopas...@cox.net>
Subject: Re: ACWM

The little town in Maine where ACWM is said to be located is of about 1000 
people with a per household medium income of about $21000. This is about 
one-half of the national medium income. In other words, it appear to be a less 
than well-educated population. Consider the sources. People from these towns 
are opposed to many different things. In my own home-town many of the residents 
do not understand where their own social security income comes from -- it just 
appears in their bank account by magic. They believe that social security 
should be eliminated for example.

m moon

------ Original Message ------
Received: 10:10 AM PST, 03/03/2013
From: "Kilopascal" <kilopas...@cox.net<mailto:kilopas...@cox.net>>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <usma@colostate.edu<mailto:usma@colostate.edu>>
Subject: Re: ACWM

Gene,

I don't know how possible it is.  All their replies to the BWMA and UKMA 
Facebook page all are from the ACWM and no person's name is ever mentioned.  I 
never can tell if the posts are by one person or more.

You can scan through their posts here and hopefully you may find a clue:

https://www.facebook.com/British.Weights.and.Measures.Association

They do have their own Facebook page:

https://www.facebook.com/ACWMeas/info

Their Facebook page has very little visits and most posts come from 
pro-metrics, which they tend to delete.  I believe most of their claims to be 
wishful thinking or an exaggeration of something minor and obscure.

Three names are present there.  See below.
About
Americans (and friends) who wish to promote an organized resistance to forced 
metric conversion in the United States of America

Mission

Americans (and friends) who wish to promote an organised resistance to forced 
metric conversion in the United States of America
General Information

President & Founder: Seaver Leslie
Director of Research: Peter Seymour
Metrologist: Bob Falk

Americans for Customary Weight & Measure,
P.O. Box 248
Wiscasset, Maine 04578
United States of America

If the USMA is to be effective they need to constantly observe what the enemy 
is doing otherwise no matter how small and irrelevant they are, they have the 
power to undo any thing we are trying to accomplish.

From: mechtly, eugene a<mailto:mech...@illinois.edu>
Sent: Sunday, 2013-03-03 12:52
To: Kilopascal<mailto:kilopas...@cox.net> ; U.S. Metric 
Association<mailto:usma@colostate.edu>
Cc: mechtly, eugene a<mailto:mech...@illinois.edu>
Subject: RE: ACWM

Thanks Kilopascal, for the verbatim quotation (below) of the ACWM *irrational* 
policy, posted by the bWMA.
I had never seen it before.  Can we find the name of the author and names of 
the ACWM officers?

Eugene Mechtly
________________________________
From: Kilopascal [kilopas...@cox.net]
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 11:07 AM
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: ACWM
USMA, this what you are up against in your fight to metricate the US:

This is a statement from the ACWM posted to the bWMA Facebook page.

We are committed to diversity and culture, not a cold scientific mandate 
dominating the rule of law. USC are a part of our past, they remain in the 
present, and we are committed to ensuring their future, whether that means 
educating the population on our wonderful system and why it is designed the way 
it is, launching petitions and campaigns to counteract any attacks on the 
continued legality and existence of our system, or even taking to the streets 
to halt the attempts to metricate or alter our national heritage and 
infrastructure. Thankfully, we haven't had to take to the streets to prevent 
illegal roadsigns, our regulators have figured out that metric signs aren't 
used and have removed them as they wear out on the only interstate to use that 
signage, in New Mexico or Arizona.

In the '70s, when your movement was at its strongest, the population here woke 
up and became very vocal that they did NOT want sweeping changes made 
arbitrarily, bureaucratically as it did in Canada, the UK. Some industry 
converted where it suited them, others did not and continue to use our system 
today, both here and abroad.

They are willing to take the fight to the streets if metrication were to 
increase.  You can ignore them, but they are not ignoring you.  They are 
fighting you every step of the way.  I hope you have a plan of action against 
them.







No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2013.0.2899 / Virus Database: 2641/6141 - Release Date: 03/01/13



No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2013.0.2899 / Virus Database: 2641/6141 - Release Date: 03/01/13

Reply via email to