Here is the broadcast 
http://www.cbc.ca/radio/asithappens/as-it-happens-wednesday-edition-1.3018322 
<http://www.cbc.ca/radio/asithappens/as-it-happens-wednesday-edition-1.3018322>

You can listen to the full broadcast, the item I heard is in part 2: 
temperature harmonization, An american trade representative tells us why his 
country wants Canada to switch back to Fahrenheit. You can listen to part 2 
only.

Mike Payne

u
> On 03 Apr 2015, at 13:19, John M. Steele <jmsteele9...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> 
> The International Dairy Foods Association lists several protocols (time and 
> temperature) for pasteurization, including ultra-pasteurized, which can be 
> stored at room temperature. The US uses mostly 15 s, 72 °C.  I wonder if the 
> difference is merely which protocol is preferred or required. I can't imagine 
> we would quibble over whether the temperature is stated in °C or °F as long 
> as they were equivalent.
> 
> http://www.idfa.org/news-views/media-kits/milk/pasteurization 
> <http://www.idfa.org/news-views/media-kits/milk/pasteurization>
> From: Michael Payne <metricmik...@gmail.com>
> To: U.S. Metric Association <usma@colostate.edu> 
> Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 8:20 AM
> Subject: [USMA:54674] Troubling agreement
> 
> I just happened to be listening to the CBC news early this morning was half 
> asleep but paid more attention when I realized they were discussing an 
> apparent agreement for Canada to drop some of it’s metric requirements for 
> trade with the USA (NAFTA?), they talked about pasteurization temperatures as 
> an example, from the sound of the conversation this was being pushed on 
> Canada by the Washington based trade negotiator, the presenter seemed a 
> little aghast that this could happen, 
> 
> I’ve not had time to google this apart from a cursory “Canada to drop metric 
> system nafta” query which didn’t seem to bring up anything. Later on I’ll be 
> able to spend a bit more time researching this, but I’m really amazed that 
> this is being stuffed down the throats of the Canadians.
> 
> Mike Payne
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to