Send USRP-users mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of USRP-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: RFNOC x310 image 2 bytes too large (Sam Carey)
2. Can the USRP B210 do passive scanning of WIFI? (John DeLeong)
3. Re: Can the USRP B210 do passive scanning of WIFI?
(Dave NotTelling)
4. Re: RFNOC x310 image 2 bytes too large (Long, Jeffrey P.)
5. Twin RX Bandwidth Requirements (Rigney, Kevin E)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 20:14:32 -0400
From: Sam Carey <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] RFNOC x310 image 2 bytes too large
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hey Jeff,
I?ve had the same problem for a while. My workaround was to simply edit the
image loader so that it is ok with the larger file size.
Just do a search for the smaller byte number in the uhd/host source code,
change it to the larger byte number, and rebuild/reinstall uhd.
Apparently, the byte count is not a strict requirement for image loading.
-Sam
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 16:30:00 +0800
From: John DeLeong <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [USRP-users] Can the USRP B210 do passive scanning of WIFI?
Message-ID:
<cac6kioze6kasfb8p-r8eugxyd_wlixpcb0-_35dfhorij2x...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi,
Can the USRP B210
a) do passive scanning of Wifi APs and Clients; and
b) do passive collection of Wifi packets off the air?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.ettus.com/pipermail/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com/attachments/20161003/b3825c42/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:44:21 -0400
From: Dave NotTelling <[email protected]>
To: John DeLeong <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] Can the USRP B210 do passive scanning of
WIFI?
Message-ID:
<cak6gvuoqpzgx0te9g-ya01ppz4dlp_oqpovrhyv7+kr02j0...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
John,
Check out https://github.com/bastibl/gr-ieee802-11
V/R,
-Dave
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 4:30 AM, John DeLeong via USRP-users <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can the USRP B210
> a) do passive scanning of Wifi APs and Clients; and
> b) do passive collection of Wifi packets off the air?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.ettus.com/pipermail/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com/attachments/20161003/b870419a/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 14:04:23 +0000
From: "Long, Jeffrey P." <[email protected]>
To: Sam Carey <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] RFNOC x310 image 2 bytes too large
Message-ID:
<dm5pr09mb13726cbaf03a940ae86b56f2d9...@dm5pr09mb1372.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Sam-
Thanks for the reply. That sounds like an easy fix.
Just out of curiosity can you tell me what OS, vivado version, etc. you are
using.
Thanks
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Carey [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2016 8:15 PM
To: Long, Jeffrey P.; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] RFNOC x310 image 2 bytes too large
Hey Jeff,
I?ve had the same problem for a while. My workaround was to simply edit the
image loader so that it is ok with the larger file size.
Just do a search for the smaller byte number in the uhd/host source code,
change it to the larger byte number, and rebuild/reinstall uhd.
Apparently, the byte count is not a strict requirement for image loading.
-Sam
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 15:10:08 +0000
From: "Rigney, Kevin E" <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [USRP-users] Twin RX Bandwidth Requirements
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hello,
What is the best data-link (PCI-E, 10GbE) to use with an X3X0 running two Twin
RX receivers at full rate? That setup would be two daughterboards streaming a
total of 4 channels of 80MS/s floating-point complex data back to a computer.
The pages for both the 10GbE card and PCI-E card say they support 200MS/S in
full-duplex mode. Can they run at 320MS/s in one direction?
Thanks,
Kevin Rigney
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.ettus.com/pipermail/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com/attachments/20161003/4527f3b3/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
------------------------------
End of USRP-users Digest, Vol 74, Issue 3
*****************************************
