I think that the results with clock() are correct.The main issue is that the time at which data from all frequencies is present is meaningably greater than 5 msюIf I set the time to 5 ms as in the original example, the receiver will not be able to rebuild and the time measurement shows that it needs 45 ms.
. -------- Пересылаемое сообщение -------- От: Андрей 1 <andrew4...@rambler.ru> Дата: 15.03.2018, 16:54 Кому: Usrp Users <usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> Тема: set_rx_lo_source repeat HelloEarlier I already wrote about big times for the example of twinrx_freq_hopping http://lists.ettus.com/pipermail/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com/2018-February/027782.htmlCan anyone analyze the source code(rx_samples_c in the attachment) and say why it turns out such a strange result (TestTwinRX) when called set_rx_lo_source. Thank you
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
