Ah! The situation is different then!
Chances are that the same bandwidth will still fit through USB2, and
since USB3 is backwards compatible: You don't even have a problem :)
Just connect your B200 as you did your HackRF. 

Note that full-duplex might need more USB bandwidth than half, but I
guess the easiest way to figure that out is to try :)

Best regards,
Marcus

On Sun, 2018-04-29 at 16:44 -0600, Brian Gieryk wrote:
> I am currently running a HackRF on a Pi 3B, doing multi frequency
> NBFM RX, VHF-Hi and UHF (monitoring multiple frequencies on large
> fires).
> 
> Would like a single radio solution (HackRF can not be both source and
> sink in GNUradio, so 2 boxes must be used).
> 
> Brian
> KE6IYC
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> > On Apr 29, 2018, at 16:14, Marcus Müller <marcus.muel...@ettus.com>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Brian!
> > 
> > It probably won't work great: since USB and ethernet are
> > fundamentally
> > different, the round-trip delay won't be of any fun, and I really
> > don't
> > see why you should spend your money on a network-connected USB3 hub
> > (wasn't even aware something like that existed!) to couple a
> > computer
> > with USB2 to a USB3 device.
> > 
> > You should really directly opt for a computer with a USB3 port.
> > Also,
> > Software Defined Radio at rates that require USB3 (instead of only
> > USB2, since you can also use USB2 if your sampling rates are below
> > ca
> > 10 MS/s) usually means a high CPU demand – not sure that the Pi3 is
> > the
> > universally best choice here. (I want so say that: very likely it's
> > not.)
> > 
> > So, to be honest: simply start with a decent desktop or laptop PC,
> > preferably running Linux; you might already be using one, so this
> > is a
> > zero cost option initially. Whatever you design there can (unless
> > you
> > do something architecture-specific) be ported to an ARM like that
> > in
> > the Pi easily (if necessary at all), but you're not subject to the
> > computational limitations of the Pi while you design your system.
> > When
> > you've shown it works, you can try to make it work on a Pi -
> > optimize
> > the things that are bottlenecks and so on.
> > 
> > But: you surely wouldn't be considering the Pi up front if you
> > didn't
> > have an application for such a device: What are you working on? Can
> > we
> > help you with feedback, suggestions or just encouragement?
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Marcus
> > 
> > > On Sun, 2018-04-29 at 15:54 -0600, Brian Gieryk via USRP-users
> > > wrote:
> > > Forgive me, please, if this has been asked before, but I find no
> > > way
> > > to search the archives.
> > > 
> > > I am currently shopping for a B200/B200 mini for experimenting.
> > > 
> > > I will be using a Raspberry Pi 3B+ (gigabit Ethernet), GNUradio,
> > > and
> > > am wondering if anyone has used/tried network attached USB hubs
> > > to
> > > use a USB3 device with a computer that only has USB2 ports?
> > > 
> > > Good bad or indifferent, does it work?
> > > 
> > > Thank you in advance,
> > > 
> > > Brian
> > > KE6IYC 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > USRP-users mailing list
> > > USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> > > http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.co
> > > m

_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to