On 03/05/2020 11:10 AM, Rob Kossler via USRP-users wrote:
Hi Alejandro,
Phase sync is not possible with CBX <https://kb.ettus.com/CBX#Phase_Synchronization>. Time sync and freq sync should work, but keep in mind the following:

  * The actual freq transmitted is a function of the quantized LO
    setting and the more finely quantized DUC setting.  The final
    value is not necessarily "exactly" what you ask for. So, the delta
    between your 2 signals may not be exactly 80 MHz (perhaps off by a
    fraction of a hertz because of the quantizations).
  * The two transmissions do not share the same LO. Each channel has
    its own PLL that is locked to the 10 MHz ref, but there will be
    some variability between the two PLL

Rob


Mostly what Rob said above.

Whether two same-type synthesizers will produce LO signals that "march together" even in the presence of a common high-quality reference, depends a lot on the implementation details of the synthesizer.

Additionally there are a couple of different things to consider when making phase-coherent systems:

(A) Will the synthesized LOs "march together" -- I THINK that on the CBX, the answer is YES, albeit with higher phase-noise than strictly-shared
          LO.

(B) Will there always be guaranteed zero phase-offset. With the CBX, the answer is NO. Taking a quick look at the MAX2870 data-sheet (the synthesizer chip used on the CBX), I don't see any "phase reset" feature, which SOME synthesizer chips can use to drag muiltiple
          synthesizers together into mutual zero-phase-offset after tuning.

The mutual phase noise for a strictly-shared-LO scheme will ALWAYS be better than with muiltiple-synthesizers all sharing the same reference clock. Whether that higher mutual phase noise is acceptable is very-much application specific.




_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to