On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 4:16 PM Andrew Fountain via USRP-users < usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
> Here is the output of that program with a debug build of UHD v4.4.0.0 . It > seems to point out this line > https://github.com/EttusResearch/uhd/blob/UHD-4.4/host/lib/rfnoc/rfnoc_graph.cpp#L393 > <https://usg02.safelinks.protection.office365.us/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FEttusResearch%2Fuhd%2Fblob%2FUHD-4.4%2Fhost%2Flib%2Frfnoc%2Frfnoc_graph.cpp%23L393&data=05%7C01%7Cafountain%40brsc.com%7C88b8030b4bc04546da0b08dba34c5916%7C5ed13283606a46b1bd4f758a462df882%7C1%7C0%7C638283320526347379%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=slguBgDjdkkbg3%2BVIUXeNlVKwFeMKl8%2BeTz46RzONWs%3D&reserved=0> > > It doesn't seem to be some weird threading issue related to getting > multiple rx_streamers at the same time; adding a lock around that access to > that get_rx_stream function still yields segmentation faults at the same > point in get_rx_stream. > Are you sure? Can you move the streamer creation to be outside of the for loop and just iterate on the stream args, issue command, and recv()? Brian
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
