Hello Brian, Thank you for this quick answer.
So I guess this is not a limitation related to using Python vs C++/boost ? Right ?
I understand that using the same streamer is tricky. Concerning your advice to go with 2 streamers, you think this a totally fine way to go ?
Otherwise, I was trying to use a single streamer because I wanted to have zero delay between the start time of the 2 streams.
Chris Christophe Grimault NovaGrid SAS Les Jardins de la Teillais 3, allée de la grande égalonne 35740 Pacé, France Tel : (33)2 23 41 37 97 Mob: (33)6 82 22 46 93 www.novagrid.com Le 16/12/2024 à 15:27, Brian Padalino a écrit :
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 9:15 AM Christophe Grimault <[email protected]> wrote:Dear users, I'm using python wrappers with UHD >= 4.5 and a X300 with 2 twinRx. I would like to know if it is possible to create a streamer, for more than N channels, with a sampling rate which different for each channel. As for now, when I try this, I get all my 4 channels with the same sampling rate, which is the one of the last channel added. Is it just possible to do it ? Say, for example, have a streamer with 2 channels : * chan 0 on fc = 140 Mhz, rx_rate=20 MS/s * chan 1 on fc = 140 MHz, rx_rate=1 MS/s Thanks in advanceI don't think this is possible, but if it is I don't think it's advisable. You should use 2 different streamers. The timestamps associated with them should be the same so on the host you can still align them, but the streamers itself I think would be weird trying to receive the same N samples over the 2 channels.Is there any particular reason you don't want to use 2 streamers? Brian _______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email [email protected]
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
