On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 18:22 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > Hi David! > > David Zeuthen [2006-01-12 12:07 -0500]: > > But... there's a world of difference from a local exploit that requires > > you to be at the console... to one that doesn't require physical. > > True. > > > Calling hal dangerous in that sense is frankly not fair. > > Sorry, this was just a heated reaction to the 'crippled'. I apologize. > Let's forget about this part, shall we?
Sure thing :-) > > > I don't really have the time, the energy nor the inclination to argue > > about this any more. > > *agree*, me neither. > > > I really do hope to see the patch from you or Matthew that splits > > hald into two processes.. > > Yes, I'm sure we'll find a solution. Sjoerd Simons is already working > at one, too. :) Sounds good! > > > with this, we can start shipping the same code. Only by doing this > > we can pave the way for e.g. gfloppy to do useful things using HAL. > > I'd hate to see Ubuntu do one thing and Red Hat and Novell another. > > That would just be a waste of time. > > *nod* Awesome! Cheers, David _______________________________________________ utopia-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/utopia-list
