On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 07:59 +0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Sorry for the delay.
> 
> > I suppose we currently only need do the regset work, right? Attached
> is
> > the ia64 part, which mostly is a copy-paste of previous utrace patch
> > with some fixes. The issue is we have some duplicate code to access
> > registers. Will you add the ptrace_layout_access API? This could
> help
> > remove a lot of duplicate code.
> 
> For ia64, there are three areas that need attention.  These three
> tracks
> can all go in parallel.  The user_regset work itself is the one I'd
> focus
> on third, because the other two should be quicker to get merged
> upstream.
> On each of these tracks, it's probably best to produce multiple
> incremental
> patches that don't break anything along the way (bisect-friendly) to
> make
> it easy for the upstream maintainers to digest.
SOrry for the long delay, just back from vocation.
> 
> 1. arch_has_single_step/arch_has_block_step
> 2. TIF_RESTORE_RSE
The RSE patch is in base kernel. For the cleanup, Petr already sent a
series of patches, see thread
http://marc.info/?l=linux-ia64&m=120276611704615&w=2. Great!

> 3. user_regset
I'll continue doing the regset part cleanup as you suggested.

Thanks,
Shaohua

Reply via email to