On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:48:45 +0200, Wenji Huang wrote: ... > step-jump-cont-strict PASS on utrace patched 2.6.25 x86 kernel,
Isn't it SKIP (77)? Please see below. > fails on on utrace patched 2.6.25 x86_64 kernel. It says: > ./step-jump-cont-strict: step-jump-cont-strict.c:501: test_singleblock (, > instruction -1): IP 0x400917 expected: found 0x400911 That should be correct as the Roland's fix for this case https://www.redhat.com/archives/utrace-devel/2008-April/msg00004.html is still not present in either upstream 2.6.25 or Fedora 2.6.25-1.fc9. > I found the definition of PTRACE_SINGLEBLOCK in test case affects the > result. > If we remove the PTRACE_SINGLEBLOCK definition statements from __x86_64__ > branch, the test will PASS. * Thanks for the bugreport, __i386__ was missing the defintion. It was provided only for __x86_64__ so far. * I do not understand how it may make a difference on i386 / x86_64. Both the upstream and Fedora 2.6.25 kernels define it by: <linux/ptrace.h> -> <asm-x86/ptrace.h> -> <asm-x86/ptrace-abi.h> And it is always defined to the value 33 (decimal), isn't it? * I guess it is a misunderstanding here, are you sure it is a PASS and not SKIP? Please check the return code $? if it is not 77 (SKIP). This is the style used by the automake testsuite framework in use. Thanks for the report, Jan
