On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > > If testing utrace against its main application requires installation > > of a complete enterprise distro from a distro [...] > > This has *never* been a requirement.
You guys are getting off a tangent. Let's go back to the post that started this all. > The thing is, utrace crashes in Fedora have dominated kerneloops.org > for many months, so i'm not sure what to make of the idea of posting > a 4000+ lines of core kernel code patchset on the last day of the > development cycle, a posting that has carefully avoided the Cc:-ing > of affected maintainers ;-) .. and dammit, I agree 100%. If utrace really shows up in _any_ way on kerneloops.org, then I think THE ENTIRE DISCUSSION in this thread is moot. I'm not going to take known-bad crap. It's that simple. Don't bother posting it, don't bother discussing it, don't bother making excuses for it. Linus