> I'd prefer to send it separately, just to avoid the "how this hook is > connected to subtle changes in do_signal_stop" questions/discussion.
Fine, it's up to you and Andrew. > Hmm... shouldn't we move this comment above schedule() ? And, perhaps, > > /* Now we don't run again until continued or killed */ > > ? Sure, it's fine to rewrite it. You might say "woken by SIGCONT or SIGKILL" to make it a little more explicit what you mean. Thanks, Roland
