> Hmm. I think this is not exacly right. Suppose that > report->action == UTRACE_INTERRUPT but utrace->interrupt is already set. > In that case, since UTRACE_INTERRUPT <= UTRACE_REPORT, we set ->report. > > Not really bad, but not right anyway.
Ah, true. It enables harmless but superfluous work. I've committed an equivalent change. Thanks, Roland
