> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:36:54 +0200, Roland McGrath wrote: > > It would be worthwhile to cons a version of this test case that uses > > PTRACE_SINGLESTEP instead of PTRACE_SYSCALL. I think your situation > > is tickling the same issue, but we should have an empirical test. > [...] > > I have a fix in hand that I'll send upstream before too long. But perhaps > > it should wait for the PTRACE_SINGLESTEP version of the test case. > > Seeing you already added one yourself.
Yes, it was easy enough to make the variant and I wanted to test it. I did so, and submitted the fix upstream, and Linus merged it. I didn't ask for it to be put in stable branches, since we probably don't care. Thanks, Roland
