On 10/15, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > Roland, do you see other problems with attach/detach which > > should be fixed before v1? > > It depends what v1 means, on which I am not entirely clear.
The definition of v1 is very simple and absolutely precise. The code is v1 when Roland thinks we can make the RFC patch and send it for review. > For "merge-worthy", aside from readability/comment cleanup in ptrace.c > itself, we still have some deeper issues like a non-kludgey way to do > synchronization that also proves utrace proper can be used without a > special kludge to implement anything real. I'm guessing that's what you > mean will be v>1. In my opinion - yes. More, personally I think it is OK to do this change after utrace and utrace-ptrace are merged, at least in -mm. Oleg.
