On 10/29, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > The only problem with this change (if we do it now), it is always nice > > to have a separate changelog to document the behaviour change. But > > hopefully nobody cares, I mean, nobody will notice the difference. > > This seems like something we could change upstream first, to clarify and > separate the behavior change. If the arch bits about choosing si_code et > al are resolved, then it is simple to make the old kernel's tracehook calls > post a signal instead of using ptrace_notify.
Ah, yes. I forgot about si_code/etc filling. Of course, the discussed change which kills PTRACE_EVENT_SIGTRAP has to fill *info correctly too. Oleg.
