I think this answers my questions in the previous email I sent. On 11/09, Roland McGrath wrote: > > I wouldn't make the behavior conditional on the arch hook's definition. I > think a consistent change to a real SIGTRAP signal is better for any arch. > Until each arch defines the hook, it can just get the default siginfo_t > contents of 0-fill.
OK. > This arch hook is purely for the single-step case. For that the name > "arch_fill_sigtrap_info" is too generic-sounding. I'd make it fit in with > the existing *_step stuff, e.g. "user_single_step_siginfo". OK. > I think for an arch_has_* #ifdef it is normal to make them uppercase. > Anyway, those naming details can get upstream feedback when you post. OK. ARCH_HAS_SINGLE_STEP_INFO ? Oleg.