[RFC,PATCH 02/14] signals: check ->group_stop_count after tracehook_get_signal()

[Oleg Nesterov]

(already in mm: signals-check-group_stop_count-after-tracehook_get_signal.patch)

Move the call to do_signal_stop() down, after tracehook call.
This makes ->group_stop_count condition visible to tracers before
do_signal_stop() will participate in this group-stop.

Currently the patch has no effect, tracehook_get_signal() always
returns 0.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Roland McGrath <rol...@redhat.com>
---

 kernel/signal.c |    9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- V1/kernel/signal.c~2_DO_SIGNAL_STOP_AFTER_TRACEHOOK 2009-11-24 
19:46:51.000000000 +0100
+++ V1/kernel/signal.c  2009-11-24 19:51:13.000000000 +0100
@@ -1807,11 +1807,6 @@ relock:
 
        for (;;) {
                struct k_sigaction *ka;
-
-               if (unlikely(signal->group_stop_count > 0) &&
-                   do_signal_stop(0))
-                       goto relock;
-
                /*
                 * Tracing can induce an artifical signal and choose sigaction.
                 * The return value in @signr determines the default action,
@@ -1823,6 +1818,10 @@ relock:
                if (unlikely(signr != 0))
                        ka = return_ka;
                else {
+                       if (unlikely(signal->group_stop_count > 0) &&
+                           do_signal_stop(0))
+                               goto relock;
+
                        signr = dequeue_signal(current, &current->blocked,
                                               info);